Send us a text

Power doesn’t fail by accident; it fails when meaning gets soft and speed outruns scrutiny. We take a hard look at how the founders engineered a system to restrain ambition and why modern politics treats those restraints as defects to be bypassed. From Madison’s cold-eyed diagnosis of factions in Federalist 10 to the deliberate friction of Federalist 47–51, we trace how separation of powers protects liberty by slowing our worst impulses and forcing real accountability.

We also set the record straight on Hamilton’s Federalist 70. “Energy in the executive” wasn’t a love letter to ego; it was a demand for clarity so citizens know exactly who is responsible when things go wrong. When responsibility diffuses across councils, task forces, and alphabet agencies, accountability evaporates. That’s not constitutional strength—it’s bureaucratic cover. Along the way, we bring the often-ignored Anti‑Federalists back into focus. Patrick Henry and George Mason weren’t anti‑America; they were anti‑amnesia, and their pressure gave us the Bill of Rights, the written limits that make emergency shortcuts harder.

This is a conversation about original public meaning, not nostalgia. Meaning fixes the law so power can’t reinterpret restraint out of existence. It’s also a reminder that rights come with duties: speech with tolerance, due process with acceptance, liberty with discipline. We connect the founders’ intellectual roots—Locke, Montesquieu, Blackstone—to today’s temptations toward consolidation, permanent emergencies, and policy written for applause over outcomes. If you’re tired of outrage theater and hungry for first principles, you’ll find a steady, clear path back to civic competence and constitutional self‑government.

Subscribe, share with a friend who quotes the founders, and leave a review with the one restraint you think Congress should restore first. Your voice helps keep real accountability—and real conversation—alive.

Support the show