Fracturism vs. René Descartes: A Philosophical Comparison

Introduction

Fracturism and René Descartes represent two starkly divergent philosophical worldviews. Descartes, a 17th-century rationalist, sought certainty through reason, famously concluding “Cogito, ergo sum” (“I think, therefore I am”). Fracturism, in contrast, is a modern existential-realist philosophy rooted in collapse theory, posthuman myth-making, and radical authorship of self in an indifferent cosmos. It rejects foundational certainty and embraces adaptive meaning-making amid entropy and fragmentation.

Below is a comparative analysis, including both supportive alignments and core contradictions between the two.