Tribunal of Conscience

Fragment or Collapse? Tolle vs. Hicks on Trial


Listen Later

🎙️ Podcast Preview: Fragment or Collapse? Tolle vs. Hicks on Trial

This episode expands on a Tribunal judgment evaluating the spiritual teachings of Eckhart Tolle and Jerry and Esther Hicks under the triune strain of truth, love, and justice.

The analysis finds that Tolle’s work sustains fragmentary coherence: it provides moments of therapeutic stillness and partial alignment, though it remains incomplete. By contrast, Hicks’ teachings collapse structurally: they distort truth by rewriting history, fracture love by shifting blame onto victims, and evade justice by excusing oppressors.

The conclusion is stark: Tolle’s teaching may serve as a limited, partial witness to coherence, while Hicks’ system stands as a false form — one that risks psychological harm and wider social distortion.


☩ Tribunal of Conscience ☩
Truth. Love. Justice.

All episodes are part of the ongoing work of the Tribunal of Conscience — testing forms under the triune strain to reveal what holds and what collapses.

Follow and connect:

  • 🌐 Tribunal Website
  • ✉️ Subscribe for updates
  • 🎧 Available on Apple, Spotify, and all major platforms

Let those who see the structure, name it without fear.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Tribunal of ConscienceBy Shawn A. Scott