<p>Today’s episode is about necessary assumptions — the unstated ideas an argument <em>must</em> rely on to reach its conclusion, even if no one ever says them out loud. </p>

Today’s episode is about necessary assumptions — the unstated ideas an argument must rely on to reach its conclusion, even if no one ever says them out loud.

FTC v. Meta and the Moody Binary

“LSAT Logic Applied” breaks down everyday arguments in news, politics, and ads using the tools of LSAT logical reasoning. Learn to spot flawed assumptions, strengthen arguments, and think like a law student—without "prepping" for the test. Quick, clear, and a little nerdy.

Share FTC v. Meta and the Moody Binary

Sign up to save your podcasts

FTC v. Meta and the Moody Binary

FTC v. Meta and the Moody Binary