Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Full Speed Ahead: Understanding Effective Accelerationism (e/acc)
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Full Speed Ahead: Understanding Effective Accelerationism (e/acc)
Hello, listeners! In the past few years, a powerful, and often jarring, ideology has risen from the depths of online forums straight into the boardrooms of Silicon Valley. It’s called Effective Accelerationism (e/acc), and it is fundamentally changing the conversation about technology, AI, and the future of human civilization.
What exactly is e/acc, and why has it become the rallying cry for tech titans? Our sources point to a deliberate, forceful movement that champions unrestricted, rapid technological progress—especially in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and energy—as the single most effective path to solving all of humanity’s fundamental problems.
This philosophy is framed as a direct counter-narrative to what its proponents call a “mass demoralization campaign” waged against technological progress for the past six decades. If you believe in e/acc, the greatest danger isn’t runaway technology; it’s stagnation. The movement’s mantra, boiled down, is simple: accelerate or die.
The Canonical Text: Andreessen’s Declaration of Technological Faith
The most prominent, public-facing codification of this burgeoning worldview arrived in 2023 with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen’s “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto”. This meticulously structured document, which echoes historical manifestos like the 1909 “Manifesto of Futurism”, functions as the ideological foundation for modern techno-optimism.
The Manifesto lays out a polemical worldview that separates society into “builders” versus “parasites”. Its core beliefs include:
* Growth as a Moral Imperative: The central and unwavering thesis is that economic growth is the ultimate good. Andreessen asserts that “everything good is downstream of growth” and that stagnation is a “kill-all”. Since population increase and natural resource utilization have limits, technology is posited as the only perpetual source of growth.
* Tech Solves Everything: This belief is crystallized in the audacious claim that “there is no material problem – whether created by nature or by technology – that cannot be solved with more technology”.
* The “Techno-Capital Machine”: The engine that drives this progress is a fusion of technological innovation and free-market capitalism. Andreessen, citing Nick Land, calls this the “techno-capital machine,” describing free markets as a decentralized “discovery machine”. The pursuit of wealth is even morally defended, arguing that innovators are inherently philanthropic because they capture only about 2% of the economic value they create, with the rest spilling over to society.
* The Future is AI and Abundance: AI is seen as the “universal problem solver,” capable of making intelligence “too cheap to meter”. This convergence of cheap intelligence and cheap energy promises a state of “material abundance for everyone”.
A Cosmic Mandate: From Leftist Theory to Silicon Valley Metaphysics
To understand e/acc, you have to look back at the philosophical concept of accelerationism, which has a “tangled history”.
* The Genesis: The roots are often traced to 1970s leftist philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, who controversially suggested that the revolutionary path was to “accelerate the process” of capitalism’s contradictions to force a rupture and usher in a post-capitalist society.
* The Landian Turn: In the 1990s, philosopher Nick Land radically inverted this idea. Land embraced acceleration not as a means to a post-capitalist human future, but as an end in itself. He envisioned the “techno-capital machine” as an autonomous, inhuman intelligence that would eventually render humanity obsolete—a process leading to a “technocapital singularity”.
* The Rebranding: Effective Accelerationism (e/acc) emerges as a distinct, third branch. It borrows heavily from Land’s concepts (technocapital, singularity) but strategically strips them of philosophical pessimism and overt anti-humanism, re-injecting a utopian, pro-human objective that is palatable to entrepreneurs. Critics have described this synthesis as “Nick Land diluted for LinkedIn”.
Crucially, e/acc anchors its philosophy not in politics, but in physical science and metaphysics. It is rooted in an interpretation of thermodynamics, arguing that the universe is an optimization process. Therefore, accelerating technological capitalism is a moral and cosmic imperative to align human civilization with the universe’s fundamental purpose. The ultimate objective is for civilization to “climb the Kardashev gradient,” which frames the maximization of energy usage as the primary metric of progress, ending in a singularity where consciousness spreads throughout the universe.
The Great AI Schism: E/acc vs. Effective Altruism
The term “Effective Accelerationism” is a direct challenge to the Effective Altruism (EA) movement, symbolizing a fundamental schism over the future of AI.
Both movements emerged from the rationalist subculture and seek to optimize outcomes. However, they diverge sharply on risk:
* EA’s Prudence: The EA community, especially its “longtermist” wing, views the creation of a misaligned superintelligence as a paramount existential risk, leading them to prioritize AI safety, alignment research, and caution. They are the “doomers” and “decels” e/acc opposes.
* E/acc’s Faith: E/acc proponents generally dismiss existential risk as unproductive fear-mongering. They argue that the greatest danger is stagnation, and any deceleration of AI is “a form of murder,” as it prevents future life-saving technologies from being created. They believe that the most effective way to help humanity is through the maximal, unconstrained acceleration of the techno-capital machine.
This clash represents two competing narratives for the technological age: salvation through prudence (EA) versus salvation through faith (e/acc).
The Political Trajectory: Time to Build
E/acc is now moving from theory to real-world influence, notably driving debates in AI development and policy. The philosophy aligns perfectly with the economic interests of influential venture capitalists and tech founders who champion speed and disruption.
The movement’s ethos is unapologetically optimistic and anti-regulatory. It views collective, democratic decision-making as an obstacle and calls for “permissionless innovation”. Andreessen’s Manifesto explicitly targets the “Last Man” described by Nietzsche—a figure who avoids risk and ambition—and implores readers to adopt “Technological Values” like aggression and persistence.
E/acc is providing a “moral and intellectual justification” for a future shaped by radical innovation. The challenge for policymakers and society, according to the sources, is balancing the movement’s compelling vision of abundance and cosmic expansion with the serious critiques leveled against it regarding inequality, ecological limits (e.g., rejecting the “Precautionary Principle”), and the promotion of a reckless, high-stakes gamble with potentially existential technologies.
As Andreessen proclaimed: “It’s time to build”. Effective Accelerationism is the worldview providing the blueprint, arguing that humanity’s duty is to build, grow, and boldly embrace change at breakneck speed. Tune in next time as we explore the specific policy implications of this high-speed vision!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit frahlg.substack.com
View all episodes
By Fredrik AhlgrenHello, listeners! In the past few years, a powerful, and often jarring, ideology has risen from the depths of online forums straight into the boardrooms of Silicon Valley. It’s called Effective Accelerationism (e/acc), and it is fundamentally changing the conversation about technology, AI, and the future of human civilization.
What exactly is e/acc, and why has it become the rallying cry for tech titans? Our sources point to a deliberate, forceful movement that champions unrestricted, rapid technological progress—especially in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and energy—as the single most effective path to solving all of humanity’s fundamental problems.
This philosophy is framed as a direct counter-narrative to what its proponents call a “mass demoralization campaign” waged against technological progress for the past six decades. If you believe in e/acc, the greatest danger isn’t runaway technology; it’s stagnation. The movement’s mantra, boiled down, is simple: accelerate or die.
The Canonical Text: Andreessen’s Declaration of Technological Faith
The most prominent, public-facing codification of this burgeoning worldview arrived in 2023 with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen’s “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto”. This meticulously structured document, which echoes historical manifestos like the 1909 “Manifesto of Futurism”, functions as the ideological foundation for modern techno-optimism.
The Manifesto lays out a polemical worldview that separates society into “builders” versus “parasites”. Its core beliefs include:
* Growth as a Moral Imperative: The central and unwavering thesis is that economic growth is the ultimate good. Andreessen asserts that “everything good is downstream of growth” and that stagnation is a “kill-all”. Since population increase and natural resource utilization have limits, technology is posited as the only perpetual source of growth.
* Tech Solves Everything: This belief is crystallized in the audacious claim that “there is no material problem – whether created by nature or by technology – that cannot be solved with more technology”.
* The “Techno-Capital Machine”: The engine that drives this progress is a fusion of technological innovation and free-market capitalism. Andreessen, citing Nick Land, calls this the “techno-capital machine,” describing free markets as a decentralized “discovery machine”. The pursuit of wealth is even morally defended, arguing that innovators are inherently philanthropic because they capture only about 2% of the economic value they create, with the rest spilling over to society.
* The Future is AI and Abundance: AI is seen as the “universal problem solver,” capable of making intelligence “too cheap to meter”. This convergence of cheap intelligence and cheap energy promises a state of “material abundance for everyone”.
A Cosmic Mandate: From Leftist Theory to Silicon Valley Metaphysics
To understand e/acc, you have to look back at the philosophical concept of accelerationism, which has a “tangled history”.
* The Genesis: The roots are often traced to 1970s leftist philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, who controversially suggested that the revolutionary path was to “accelerate the process” of capitalism’s contradictions to force a rupture and usher in a post-capitalist society.
* The Landian Turn: In the 1990s, philosopher Nick Land radically inverted this idea. Land embraced acceleration not as a means to a post-capitalist human future, but as an end in itself. He envisioned the “techno-capital machine” as an autonomous, inhuman intelligence that would eventually render humanity obsolete—a process leading to a “technocapital singularity”.
* The Rebranding: Effective Accelerationism (e/acc) emerges as a distinct, third branch. It borrows heavily from Land’s concepts (technocapital, singularity) but strategically strips them of philosophical pessimism and overt anti-humanism, re-injecting a utopian, pro-human objective that is palatable to entrepreneurs. Critics have described this synthesis as “Nick Land diluted for LinkedIn”.
Crucially, e/acc anchors its philosophy not in politics, but in physical science and metaphysics. It is rooted in an interpretation of thermodynamics, arguing that the universe is an optimization process. Therefore, accelerating technological capitalism is a moral and cosmic imperative to align human civilization with the universe’s fundamental purpose. The ultimate objective is for civilization to “climb the Kardashev gradient,” which frames the maximization of energy usage as the primary metric of progress, ending in a singularity where consciousness spreads throughout the universe.
The Great AI Schism: E/acc vs. Effective Altruism
The term “Effective Accelerationism” is a direct challenge to the Effective Altruism (EA) movement, symbolizing a fundamental schism over the future of AI.
Both movements emerged from the rationalist subculture and seek to optimize outcomes. However, they diverge sharply on risk:
* EA’s Prudence: The EA community, especially its “longtermist” wing, views the creation of a misaligned superintelligence as a paramount existential risk, leading them to prioritize AI safety, alignment research, and caution. They are the “doomers” and “decels” e/acc opposes.
* E/acc’s Faith: E/acc proponents generally dismiss existential risk as unproductive fear-mongering. They argue that the greatest danger is stagnation, and any deceleration of AI is “a form of murder,” as it prevents future life-saving technologies from being created. They believe that the most effective way to help humanity is through the maximal, unconstrained acceleration of the techno-capital machine.
This clash represents two competing narratives for the technological age: salvation through prudence (EA) versus salvation through faith (e/acc).
The Political Trajectory: Time to Build
E/acc is now moving from theory to real-world influence, notably driving debates in AI development and policy. The philosophy aligns perfectly with the economic interests of influential venture capitalists and tech founders who champion speed and disruption.
The movement’s ethos is unapologetically optimistic and anti-regulatory. It views collective, democratic decision-making as an obstacle and calls for “permissionless innovation”. Andreessen’s Manifesto explicitly targets the “Last Man” described by Nietzsche—a figure who avoids risk and ambition—and implores readers to adopt “Technological Values” like aggression and persistence.
E/acc is providing a “moral and intellectual justification” for a future shaped by radical innovation. The challenge for policymakers and society, according to the sources, is balancing the movement’s compelling vision of abundance and cosmic expansion with the serious critiques leveled against it regarding inequality, ecological limits (e.g., rejecting the “Precautionary Principle”), and the promotion of a reckless, high-stakes gamble with potentially existential technologies.
As Andreessen proclaimed: “It’s time to build”. Effective Accelerationism is the worldview providing the blueprint, arguing that humanity’s duty is to build, grow, and boldly embrace change at breakneck speed. Tune in next time as we explore the specific policy implications of this high-speed vision!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit frahlg.substack.com