GenSea

GenSea

By Eva Rohlfer & Josefa BeyerScienceEducationNatural Sciences
Download on the App Store

GenSea episodes

  • Camille & Rhea | Chemical Pollution in Dolphins and Whales

    Chemical pollution is an invisible but persistent threat to marine ecosystems. Industrial processes, agriculture, mining and energy production release contaminants that can travel long distances, remain in the environment for decades and accumulate in marine food webs.

    In this episode of the GenSea Podcast, Rhea and Camille speak with Sacha Boubet, a PhD researcher at the Pelagis Observatory in La Rochelle, France. Sacha studies chemical contamination in stranded cetaceans in the Bay of Biscay. Her research examines how contaminants accumulate in different species and how diet and ecology influence exposure and vulnerability.

    The conversation covers persistent organic pollutants—including PCBs, DDT and PBDEs—as well as metals such as mercury and cadmium. Sacha explains why scientists analyse blubber, liver and kidney tissue, what long-term stranding records reveal about pollution, and how this research can contribute to conservation and environmental policy.

    In this episode

    • How Sacha became interested in marine ecotoxicology
    • Common contaminants found in dolphins and other cetaceans
    • Potential effects on immunity, reproduction, hormones and the nervous system
    • How pollutants accumulate in blubber, liver and kidney tissue
    • What stranded marine mammals reveal about ocean health
    • Why contamination is a global issue—even in remote regions
    • Possible changes in mercury concentrations over time
    • The Stockholm Convention and Minamata Convention
    • How research supports cetacean conservation and environmental policy
    • Advice for students interested in marine science
    • A rapid-fire round on metals, microplastics, regulation and marine predators
    • Thank you to Sacha Boubet for joining the GenSea Podcast and sharing her research. Follow GenSea on Instagram for more information about the episode and the featured scientific paper.

      Cover Credit: Noemi Merz / Ocean Image Bank

      21 min
    • Camille & Rhea | Tourism in Antarctica

      In their #3 episode, Rhea and Camille explore the growing impact of tourism on Antarctica, one of the world’s most fragile ecosystems. They discuss the rise of “last-chance tourism,” the environmental and biosecurity risks of visitors, and whether seeing climate change firsthand can really change people’s perspectives.

      Drawing on their experiences as scientists and Antarctic field researchers, they also discuss the role tourism can play in supporting research and citizen science, the realities of working in Antarctica, and whether current governance is enough to protect the continent.

      In this episode, we discuss:

      • The rise of tourism in Antarctica.
      • What “last-chance tourism” means.
      • The hidden environmental impacts of tourism.
      • Antarctic microbes, invasive species, and biosecurity.
      • Whether tourism can support scientific research.
      • Citizen science and science communication.
      • What Antarctic fieldwork is really like.
      • The future of Antarctic tourism and governance.
      • Whether visitor caps and protected areas are needed.
      • Penguins vs. microbes: Antarctica’s real MVP.
      • Picture Credit: Alexandre Herbrecht, Studio PONANT / Ocean Image Bank

        35 min
      • Camille & Rhea | Inside the Global Plastics Treaty with Valentin Dettling

        In their #2 episode, Camille and Rhea explore the journey from the laboratory to the negotiation table with Valentin Dettling, a PhD student specializing in deep-sea microplastic pollution and an active participant in the United Nations Global Plastics Treaty negotiations.

        Valentin shares how his background in biology led him to environmental science, why archived museum specimens offer a unique window into the history of plastic pollution, and how interdisciplinary research has shaped his career. He also takes us behind the scenes of the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations, explaining how scientists contribute evidence, communicate with negotiators, and navigate the complex world of international diplomacy.

        Guest

        Valentin Dettling is a researcher based in Paris whose work focuses on microplastic pollution in the deep sea. During his PhD, he became actively involved in the Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty, contributing scientific expertise to the ongoing United Nations negotiations for a legally binding Global Plastics Treaty.

        In this episode, we discuss:

        • How Valentin transitioned from human biology to environmental science.
        • Investigating decades of deep-sea microplastic pollution using museum collections.
        • Why plastic pollution requires interdisciplinary research.
        • What actually happens during UN Global Plastics Treaty negotiations.
        • The role of scientists in supporting policymakers with evidence.
        • Challenges in communicating scientific findings to negotiators.
        • Why language and accessibility matter during international negotiations.
        • The political and economic barriers to a global plastics agreement.
        • Career opportunities at the interface of science and policy.
        • Advice for early-career researchers interested in environmental diplomacy.
        • Picture Credit: Nico Marin / Ocean Image Bank

          38 min
        • New Voices on GenSea: Rhea & Camille Take the Mic

          In this episode of GenSea, meet your hosts, Rhea and Camille. They introduce themselves, share a bit about their backgrounds and interests, and talk about what they're excited to bring to the podcast. Tune in to get to know the voices behind the mic and what's in store for future episodes.

          11 min
        • Charlotte & Lennard | Of forests and oceans

          Can planting trees on land change the oceans? Join Lennard and Charlotte this week as they dive into surprising research exploring how large-scale reforestation doesn't just pull CO2 from the air, but also alters Earth's energy balance and affects the blue planet. Here comes a fascinating example of how numerical models allow scientists to explore unimaginable futures of forested and tree-less worlds.

          Additional show notes: the Portmann et al. (2022) study considered different tree functional types based on pre-industrial distribution, so yes, the model is set up to consider different forest types, such as coniferous forest and broadleaf forests.

          Furthermore, Lennard and Charlotte were indeed talking about the same thing. The North Atlantic Warming Hole is also referred to as the 'Cold Blob'.

          Find the two studies we discuss here:

          Portmann, R., Beyerle, U., Davin, E. et al. Global forestation and deforestation affect remote climate via adjusted atmosphere and ocean circulation. Nat Commun 13, 5569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33279-9

          Banville, P. E., MacIsaac, A. J., and Zickfeld, K.: Ocean dynamics amplify remote warming effects of reforestation, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4000, 2025.

          And if you are interested in the work of Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research on AMOC, check out their website: https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/output/projects/all/1113

          Don't hesitate to contact Charlotte in case you have questions, or with suggestions for further podcast episodes on the topic ([email protected], www.linkedin.com/in/charlotte-walter-6930791aa)).

          28 min
        • Charlotte & Lennard | Climate models and trust

          Today’s episode dives into one of the biggest questions in climate science: How much can we trust future climate projections? Climate models are powerful tools, but they’re not crystal balls. To understand what they can tell us, and also where their limits lie, we explore how these models work, why uncertainty is built into them, and what that means for interpreting their results.

          We break down the key sources of uncertainty, from the chaotic nature of the Earth system to the assumptions scientists must make about future emissions, land use, and population growth. These choices shape the scenarios that models simulate, and ultimately the futures they reveal. But don't you worry! When all these factors are accounted for, our climate models are a great resource to understand our possible futures.

          Don't hesitate to contact us in case you have questions, or with suggestions for further research and podcast episodes on the topic ([email protected], www.linkedin.com/in/lennard-montag)).

          RESOURCES:

          CarbonBrief's climate modelling explainers:

          • History of climate modelling https://www.carbonbrief.org/timeline-history-climate-modelling/
          • How do climate models work? https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-how-do-climate-models-work/
          • Can we trust models: https://www.carbonbrief.org/can-we-trust-climate-models/
          • Model comparison against observations – RealClimate posts by Gavin Schmidt and colleagues:

            https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2019/12/how-good-have-climate-models-been-at-truly-predicting-the-future/
            https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/climate-model-projections-compared-to-observations/

            Information about CMIP6 Geoengineering and Carbon Removal Model Intercomparison Project (MIP):

            Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer, N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, 2018.

            Kravitz, B., Robock, A., Tilmes, S., Boucher, O., English, J. M., Irvine, P. J., Jones, A., Lawrence, M. G., MacCracken, M., Muri, H., Moore, J. C., Niemeier, U., Phipps, S. J., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Wang, H., and Watanabe, S.: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3379-3392, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015, 2015

            Lennartz, S. T., Keller, D. P., Oschlies, A., Blasius, B., & Dittmar, T. (2024). Mechanisms underpinning the net removal rates of dissolved organic carbon in the global ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 38, e2023GB007912. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007912

            Information about the emission scenarios – old and new:

            https://open.substack.com/pub/theclimatebrink/p/on-the-death-of-rcp85?utmcampaign=post-expanded-share&utmmedium=web

            32 min
          • Charlotte & Lennard | Super(duper)models and 'l@s nin@s'

            Today's episode is all about the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), a recurring pattern in the tropical Pacific. It is characterised by a cyclic pattern of warm and cold events, El Niño and La Niña. These have globally felt impacts, necessitating good predictions and a better understanding of its processes. This is the topic of Lennard's master thesis in which an interactively coupled modelling system, also referred to as a Supermodel, is evaluated for its ability to simulate the ENSO.

            Update: ENSO is for this year again projected to develop into a strong El Niño event. The NOAA expects an El Niño with ca. 60% probability and even 25% for a strong El Niño for the late year 2026.
            Don't hesitate to contact Lennard in case you have questions, or with suggestions for further research and podcast episodes on the topic ([email protected], www.linkedin.com/in/lennard-montag)).

            RESOURCES:

            Information about ENSO …
            Bayr, T., & Latif, M. (2023). ENSO atmospheric feedbacks under global warming and their relation to mean-state changes. Climate Dynamics, 60(9-10), 2613–2631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06454-3
            McPhaden, M. J., Santoso, A., & Cai, W. (2020). Introduction to El Niño Southern Oscillation in a Changing Climate: 1. In El Niño Southern Oscillation in a Changing Climate (pp. 1–19). American Geophysical Union (AGU). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119548164.ch1

            Williams, A., Santoro, C. M., Smith, M. A., & Latorre, C. (2008). THE IMPACT OF ENSO IN THE ATACAMA DESERT AND AUSTRALIAN ARID ZONE: EXPLORATORY TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS . Chungara: Revista de Antropología Chilena, 40, 245–259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27802523

            … and the SuMo:
            Counillon, F., Keenlyside, N., Wang, S., Devilliers, M., Gupta, A., Koseki, S., & Shen, M.-L. (2023). Framework for an Ocean–Connected Supermodel of the Earth System. Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003310
            Duane, G. S., & Shen, M.-L. (2023). Synchronization of Alternative Models in a Supermodel and the Learning of Critical Behavior. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 80(6), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-22-0113.1
            Schevenhoven, F., Keenlyside, N., Counillon, F., Carrassi, A., Chapman,W. E., Devilliers, M., Gupta, A., Koseki, S., Selten, F. M., Shen, M.-L., Wang, S., Weiss, J. B., Wiegerinck, W., & Duane, G. S. (2023). Supermodeling: Improving Predictions with an Ensemble of Interacting Models. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(9), E1670–E1686. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0070.1

            41 min
          • Charlotte & Lennard | Sea-ice models and phytoplankton

            In this episode, Charlotte walks us through her research on how differences in sea ice models affect the biological processes in an Arctic ocean model. She breaks down how sea ice influences phytoplankton dynamics in the real world and in numerical model simulations. If you're navigating your own thesis project or feeling the pressure of an approaching deadline, the episode closes with a dose of support and motivation to help you keep going!

            Update: As the planet keeps turning, NOAA’s latest Arctic Report Card (December 2025) revealed that March 2025 marked the lowest annual Arctic maximum sea ice extent in the 47 years of available satellite record.

            Don't hesitate to contact Charlotte in case you have questions, or with suggestions for further research and podcast episodes on the topic ([email protected], www.linkedin.com/in/charlotte-walter-6930791aa)).

            RESOURCES

            **Arctic amplification **

            Rantanen, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Lipponen, A., Nordling, K., Hyvärinen, O., Ruosteenoja, K., Vihma, T., & Laaksonen, A. (2022). The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment, 3, 168. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3.

            **Arctic sea ice extent **

            NOAA Arctic Report Card 2024: Sea Ice. Meier, W. N., Petty, A., Hendricks, S., Bliss, A., Kaleschke, L., Divine, D., Farrell, S., Gerland, S., Perovich, D., Ricker, R., Tian-Kunze, X., Webster, M. https://doi.org/10.25923/aksk-7p66.
            NOAA Arctic Report Card 2025: Sea Ice. Meier, W. N., Petty, A., Hendricks, S., Bliss, A., Kaleschke, L., Divine, D., Farrell, S., Gerland, S., Perovich, D., Ricker, R., Tian-Kunze, X., Webster, M. https://doi.org/10.25923/mmxf-0r86.

            **Increase in Arctic biomass production **

            Lewis, K. M., Van Dijken, G. L., & Arrigo, K. R. (2020). Changes in phytoplankton concentration now drive increased Arctic Ocean primary production. Science, 369, 198–202. doi:10.1126/science.aay8380.
            Timmermans, M.-L., & Marshall, J. (2020). Understanding Arctic Ocean Circulation: A Review of Ocean Dynamics in a Changing Climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125, e2018JC014378. doi:10.1029/2018JC014378.

            **Sea ice models **

            Ólason, E., Boutin, G., Williams, T., Korosov, A., Regan, H., Rheinlænder, J., Rampal, P., Flocco, D., Samaké, A., Davy, R., Spain, T., & Chua, S. (2025). (PREPRINT) The next generation sea-ice model neXtSIM, Version 2. doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-3521.
            Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., & Elliott, S. (2015). CICE: The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model Documentation and Software User’s Manual Version 5.1 (LA-CC-06-012).

            43 min
          • Charlotte & Lennard | ECOPs and numerical modeling

            During this weeks episode, we are meeting you on a personal note, talking about our educational

            backgrounds and paths to become ECOPs. Why did we choose to study the marine environment?
            How did we manage so far? And what are we planning to do next? We will share some experiences
            on how to find master thesis topics and funding for research internships abroad. And yes, we go
            there: we will share how we describe numerical modelling to our families, and how models can be
            very cool! A tiny spoiler: this won’t be the last time you hear us talk about them.
            Helpful links:
            • Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (https://nersc.no/; last accessed: 10.12.2025)
            • Webpage for M.Sc. Environmental Modelling at Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg (https://uol.de/ummo-msc; last accessed: 08.01.2026)
            • Webpage Marine and Coastal Systems, University of Algarve (https://www.ualg.pt/en/curso/1740; last accessed: 08.01.2026)
            • "All models are wrong but some are useful."; Box, G.E.P. "Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building." Robustness in Statistics, edited by Robert L. Launer and Graham N. Wilkinson, Academic Press, 1979, pp. 201- 36. ScienceDirect.

            Contact:

            Lennard:

            • www.linkedin.com/in/lennard-montag
            • Charlotte

              • www.linkedin.com/in/charlotte-walter-6930791aa
              • 27 min
              • Joelle, Gilbers, Charlotte & Lennard | Ocean Myths, Legends and Tales

                No matter where you go, there will always be a tale about the ocean; whether it is to warn you about danger, to share the story of the community or to teach a lesson, ocean storytelling has always been present in the heart of our coastal societies. On this episode of GenSea, Joelle, Charlotte, Lennard and Gilbers sit around to share different stories coming from very different parts of the world like Greece, Japan, Scotland and the pacific ocean to illustrate that everywhere on the world, there will always be an ocean story to be told, you just to ask about it.

                First, Charlotte will talk to us about Greek myths and how they influenced Mediterranean cultures and what is known as western society. Who hasn’t heard of Poseidon and the oceanids ? Then, Joelle takes us to the other side of the world to share with us how Japanese folklore found an explanation to the catastrophic earthquakes and tsunamis they sustained thanks to an enormous fish that doesn’t come often to the surface. Afterwards, Lennard tells us about how Polinesian people explained the phenomenon of a vanished island on the pacific ocean. Atlantis, is that you ?. Lastly, Gilbers takes us to Scotland and Ireland, where the tale of the selkie people came to be. If you see a seal, be aware, because you might fall in love with its human version. As the episode is wrapped up, the importance of storytelling is brought to the table as well the importance of keeping myths, legends and tales alive as they define a society, specially a coastal one.

                This episode is a handover episode to let the floor to your new host for the next months, Lennard and Charlotte, two great scientists with a lot of great new topics to bring to the table. Joelle and Gilbers will come back later in the year and thank every single listener they have had over the last few months as well as all their invites. Keep connected for more!

                28 min

              About GenSea

              From the publisher's feed

              The Ocean Decade is being narrated through the eyes of early career oearly-career ocean professionals, also known as ECOPs.