Brandon and Kate dig into the Clarity Act to separate headlines from substance — what the bill actually proposes, how it fits into the broader U.S. regulatory landscape, and why clarity (or lack thereof) matters for Bitcoin, stablecoins, and builders. They walk through the tradeoffs, the political reality, and what meaningful progress would actually look like.

Topics Discussed

• 📜 What the Clarity Act is trying to do and why it exists
• ⚖️ How the bill approaches jurisdiction, definitions, and enforcement
• 🏦 Implications for stablecoins, custodians, and market structure
• 🧱 What regulatory clarity would unlock for Bitcoin and L2 builders
• 🗳️ Political realities: timelines, incentives, and likely outcomes
• 🧠 What actually matters vs. regulatory theater

Chapters

• 00:00 — Intro and framing the Clarity Act
• 02:30 — What the bill proposes at a high level
• 07:10 — Jurisdiction, definitions, and enforcement questions
• 12:45 — Stablecoins, custody, and market structure impacts
• 18:20 — What clarity would unlock for builders
• 23:50 — Political reality check and timelines
• 28:40 — Closing thoughts and what to watch next

Good For Bitcoin is hosted by Brandon Marshall (@marshallmixing) and Kate Parkman (@katemparkman).

🎧 Subscribe: goodforbitcoin.com
📺 Watch: YouTube
🎙️ Listen on: Spotify • Apple Podcasts • Amazon Music • Pocket Casts
📰 RSS: anchor.fm/s/f9f164f0/podcast/rss