This narrative explores the evolution of Gitea, an open-source, self-hosted Git service born from a 2016 fork of Gogs, a lightweight code management tool created by developer Lunny Xiao. While Gogs offered simplicity and ease of use, its single-maintainer model led to development bottlenecks and community frustration, prompting the creation of Gitea to enable faster progress and shared governance. Gitea quickly gained traction by preserving Gogs’ efficiency while embracing a more collaborative, community-driven approach, becoming a popular choice for developers, researchers, and small teams needing private, secure code hosting. However, in 2022, a major controversy emerged when Lunny Xiao and key maintainers formed Gitea Limited, a for-profit company, and transferred the project’s domain and trademark to it. This move, intended to ensure sustainability through paid services like Gitea Cloud and Enterprise support, was perceived by many in the community as a betrayal of open-source principles, raising fears of commercialization, reduced transparency, and potential restrictions on future development. In response, a group of maintainers and contributors launched Forgejo, a new fork under the non-profit Codeberg e.V., explicitly committed to remaining free, open, and community-governed. This second fork highlights a fundamental tension in open-source sustainability: balancing the need for funding and professional support with the ideals of democratic control and public ownership. Today, Gitea remains widely used and actively developed, offering robust features and commercial offerings while asserting its core will stay open-source under the MIT license. Meanwhile, Forgejo has evolved into a distinct project, prioritizing security and community needs. The ongoing dynamic between these projects reflects broader challenges in open-source software—governance, funding models, and the preservation of trust—demonstrating that the development of technology is not just a technical endeavor, but a deeply human story of collaboration, ideology, and the constant negotiation of power and purpose within digital communities.