<p>We break down 'Gladiator II' (1:48) and explain why it's fine to fall short of iconic films; then unpack Eastwood's 'Juror #2' and the topic of justice; then dive into a handful of spoilers between the two films (13:30)</p>

We break down 'Gladiator II' (1:48) and explain why it's fine to fall short of iconic films; then unpack Eastwood's 'Juror #2' and the topic of justice; then dive into a handful of spoilers between the two films (13:30)

'Gladiator II' is Everything We Want but Falls Short of Original (but....... that's fine); 'Juror No. 2' is an Unbelievable Premise & an Unexpected Philosophical Discussion

Jake travels through movie history giving out several awards - all just a gimmicky way to give his (often wrong) opinions.

Share 'Gladiator II' is Everything We Want but Falls Short of Original (but....... that's fine); 'Juror No. 2' is an Unbelievable Premise & an Unexpected Philosophical Discussion

Sign up to save your podcasts

'Gladiator II' is Everything We Want but Falls Short of Original (but....... that's fine); 'Juror No. 2' is an Unbelievable Premise & an Unexpected Philosophical Discussion

'Gladiator II' is Everything We Want but Falls Short of Original (but....... that's fine); 'Juror No. 2' is an Unbelievable Premise & an Unexpected Philosophical Discussion