Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Google on Trial for 09-18-2023
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Google on Trial for 09-18-2023
Welcome to the Google on Trial Podcast.
The United States v. Google antitrust trial resumed on September 18, 2023, with the Justice Department continuing to present its case. The first witness scheduled to testify was Brian Higgins, an executive at Verizon who oversees mobile device and customer marketing. Higgins testified about Verizon's agreements with Google, including a deal that paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices.
The Justice Department also presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain[] our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks. A ruling from Judge Amit P. Mehta is not expected until next year.
Here are some additional details from today's proceedings:
Higgins testified that Verizon paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices. He also said that Verizon negotiated with other search engines, but Google offered the best deal.
The Justice Department presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is a major test of the government's ability to regulate the tech industry. If the government wins, it could force Google to change its business practices and make it easier for competitors to emerge.
Thank you for listening. Please be sure to subscribe to the Google on Trial Podcast and never miss a beat.
The United States v. Google antitrust trial resumed on September 18, 2023, with the Justice Department continuing to present its case. The first witness scheduled to testify was Brian Higgins, an executive at Verizon who oversees mobile device and customer marketing. Higgins testified about Verizon's agreements with Google, including a deal that paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices.
The Justice Department also presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain[] our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks. A ruling from Judge Amit P. Mehta is not expected until next year.
Here are some additional details from today's proceedings:
Higgins testified that Verizon paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices. He also said that Verizon negotiated with other search engines, but Google offered the best deal.
The Justice Department presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is a major test of the government's ability to regulate the tech industry. If the government wins, it could force Google to change its business practices and make it easier for competitors to emerge.
Thank you for listening. Please be sure to subscribe to the Google on Trial Podcast and never miss a beat.
View all episodes
By Quiet. PleaseWelcome to the Google on Trial Podcast.
The United States v. Google antitrust trial resumed on September 18, 2023, with the Justice Department continuing to present its case. The first witness scheduled to testify was Brian Higgins, an executive at Verizon who oversees mobile device and customer marketing. Higgins testified about Verizon's agreements with Google, including a deal that paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices.
The Justice Department also presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain[] our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks. A ruling from Judge Amit P. Mehta is not expected until next year.
Here are some additional details from today's proceedings:
Higgins testified that Verizon paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices. He also said that Verizon negotiated with other search engines, but Google offered the best deal.
The Justice Department presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is a major test of the government's ability to regulate the tech industry. If the government wins, it could force Google to change its business practices and make it easier for competitors to emerge.
Thank you for listening. Please be sure to subscribe to the Google on Trial Podcast and never miss a beat.
The United States v. Google antitrust trial resumed on September 18, 2023, with the Justice Department continuing to present its case. The first witness scheduled to testify was Brian Higgins, an executive at Verizon who oversees mobile device and customer marketing. Higgins testified about Verizon's agreements with Google, including a deal that paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices.
The Justice Department also presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain[] our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks. A ruling from Judge Amit P. Mehta is not expected until next year.
Here are some additional details from today's proceedings:
Higgins testified that Verizon paid Google billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Verizon devices. He also said that Verizon negotiated with other search engines, but Google offered the best deal.
The Justice Department presented evidence from internal Google documents that showed the company was aware of the potential antitrust implications of its deals with Verizon and other companies. For example, one document quoted a Google executive as saying that the company needed to "maintain our dominance" in search.
Google's defense is expected to begin presenting its case in the coming weeks. The company has argued that its dominant market share is the result of superior products and services, not anticompetitive behavior. Google has also said that the Justice Department's lawsuit is misguided and would harm consumers by stifling innovation.
The trial is a major test of the government's ability to regulate the tech industry. If the government wins, it could force Google to change its business practices and make it easier for competitors to emerge.
Thank you for listening. Please be sure to subscribe to the Google on Trial Podcast and never miss a beat.