Israel under Trump's leadership, amid rising regional tensions.

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. How do you interpret the recent Israeli attack on Iran and its implications?
2. What role did intelligence collaboration play in the attack?
3. How does this attack compare to previous escalations, like the Russia-Ukraine conflict?
4. How might Russia and China respond if the U.S. escalates the conflict?
5. What are your thoughts on Trump’s potential involvement in the war?

Graham E. Fuller:

1. The attack reflects a dangerous shift toward assassination-based foreign policy and regime change goals by Israel.
2. Intelligence suggests long-term collaboration with inside actors in Iran over more than a decade to prepare for the strike.
3. Unlike Ukraine, this attack combines multiple regional tensions, including Lebanon and Russia, raising broader escalation risks.
4. Both Russia and China want to avoid direct involvement; however, they may push for diplomatic solutions to prevent nuclear proliferation.
5. Trump is unpredictable, but pressure from pro-Israel advisors likely influenced his stance, though he may avoid full escalation depending on how events unfold.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.