Hermeneutics and Perspectivalism | Dr. William Roach

Mere Simulacrity, Session 2

Throughout the ages, theological and philosophical movements have been advanced based upon

half-truths, false rhetoric, and equivocations championed as axiomatic principles.

Theologians and philosophers, whether they are evangelical or non-evangelical, still use

similar rhetorical devices to champion claims that undercut the concept of a universally valid

approach to knowledge. They will say things such as: People have different perspectives, right?

Clearly your background and personal biases influence your reading of the Bible or any other

text, right? It would be overly prideful to claim that anyone particular person has the correct

interpretation of the text, so why don’t you take a humbler approach?

Fundamental to these questions is a half-truth; namely, the fact that people do approach

events, texts, or situations from different vantage points. However, underlying this approach is a

philosophical commitment to the belief we cannot have universally valid frameworks of

understanding. Many believe any commitment to a universally valid framework of understanding

ought to be considered arrogant, white, western, patriarchal, or racist. Essential to this line of

reasoning are one of many philosophical approaches to reality known as idealism, subjectivity,

relativism, perspectivalism, or any other “ism” that affirms all we have are interpretations, not

knowledge.

Dr. Bill Roach traces the rise of different idealistic revolutions up to the present day

embrace of the existential method by evangelical scholars and pastors. He addresses Plato’s

metaphysical idealistic, Kant’s epistemological idealistic revolution, Schleiermacher’s

hermeneutical idealistic revolution, and Post-Modernism’s linguistic idealistic revolution.

Special emphasis is placed upon leading figures in philosophical hermeneutics and the various

ways present-day scholars, whether secular or evangelical, have embraced one or more of the

various expressions of philosophical idealism. Dr. Roach concludes with a call to embrace

philosophical realism as a corrective to the varying idealistic revolutions throughout the history

of ideas.

https://sovereignnations.com

Support Sovereign Nations:

https://paypal.me/sovnations

https://patreon.com/sovnations

Follow Sovereign Nations:

https://sovereignnations.com/subscribe/