
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


"Exclusion does not need a reason.
Just an excuse."
The Canary Code is a leadership book, a lesson in how to design workplace culture. The lesson starts with the design of the book itself. During this discussion, Ludmila mentioned that many of the challenges people with ADHD encounter mirror the symptoms of overwork. So the inclusive design of the book means that it's easy to digest for anyone. And that's really the message - if you design for the people who need workplace accommodations because of neurodiversity, everyone benefits. Friction is reduced.
Ludmila N. Praslova, Ph.D. is named a member of Thinkers 50 2024 Radar, a global group of 30 management thinkers leaders whose ideas are most likely to shape the future of work.
She is a Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology at the Vanguard University of Southern California and regularly writes for Harvard Business Review, Fast Company, Psychology Today, and Forbes.
She is the first person to have published in Harvard Business Review from an autistic perspective.
Dr. Praslova is a talent strategy expert with extensive experience in global diversity and neurodiversity. Her early experience in global diversity taught her the importance of creating culture-add work environments. However, the same experience and her continued career have shown that focusing on one aspect of diversity is not enough. Globally aware organizations are not always gender-inclusive, gender-focused advancement programs can exclude based on disability or socioeconomic origin, and neurodivergent people are often forgotten or segregated even in organizations considered champions of inclusion.
As a first-generation academic and a neurodivergent woman, Dr. Praslova knows first-hand that single-focus "inclusion initiatives" leave people behind. However, the principles of creating culture-add organizations can be applied to building systems for intersectional and holistic inclusion.
Her consulting is focused on creating organizational systems for supporting human dignity and well-being, and providing neuroinclusion training to organizations such as Amazon, Bank of America, and MIT.
She has a PhD in Industrial-Organizational Psychology from the University of Akron and is a Senior Certified Human Resources Practitioner (SHRM-SCP).
Dr. Praslova is an avid open-water swimmer, a gardener, and a poet.
She is a LinkedIn Top Voice in Thought Leadership
Some of Ludmila's publications:The Canary Code A Guide to Neurodiversity, Dignity, and Intersectional Belonging at Work (Berrett-Koehler, 2024); Evidence-Based Organizational Practices for Diversity, Inclusion, Belonging and Equity (ed, Cambridge-Scholars Publishing, 2023); 'An Intersectional Approach to Inclusion at Work' (Harvard Business Review, June 2022); 'The Radical Promise of Truly Flexible Work' (Harvard Business Review, August 2023); 'To build a healthy workplace, you need a toxic culture alarm' (Fast Company, March 2022); 'How Thought Leaders Can Support Workload Fairness' (Psychology Today, December 2023); 'How Managers Can Support Workload Equity' (Psychology Today, December 2023); 'How to Reclaim our Right to Rest – While Stigmatized' (Psychology Today, December 2023); 'Debunking Disability Employment Myths' (Psychology Today, September 2023).
Ludmila in the media:
Media Kit - The Canary Code
Organizational psychology has been around for around hundred years, but Praslova believes the future of organizational psychology is changing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. She foresees changes such as an increase in flexibility. Employees will be able to work remotely and off-site throughout multiple industries. To adapt to this new environment, leadership and management practices will become more adaptable and human-focused... These changes will likely fuel the need for more organizational psychology practitioners.
The book: The Canary Code book by Ludmila N. Praslova, PhD
Sponsored by Nola Simon Advisory: Learn More From This Bonus Podcast Episode
The right to disconnect is legilslation designed to protect employees from work creeping into after hours work. It's popping up all around the world including Ontario, Canada, where I live. The thing about legislation is that it's a guardrail to protect us from the worst abuses. As an employer, you never want your employees to have to invoke legislation. It's not good for trust and relationships or the employer brand. So how can you proactively update your operations to ensure that all employees benefit from the right to disconnect whether or not the legislation exists in your part of the world yet or not? Legislation is designed to disuade and penalize behaviour, not shape it or incentivize it. It's the same with ethics in AI but legislation is slow, differs across geographies and can be challenged in court. It's more about crafting norms and expectations that facilitate trust and trustworthiness.
Right To Disconnect Ontario Explained | Achkar Law
For years, I've recognized that the way change happens in organizations is disconnected from the way that executives and senior leaders perceive change to happen. Top down initiatives often fail and employees resist the change, often because the change is done to them, not with them. They can't see themselves reprsented in the story of change.
I've been following Jeppe Hansgaard on Linkedin because he's found a mathematical way to identify the 3% of staff who influence the other 90%. The key is informal networks. The change catalysts you need to engage are not the high performers or even the extroverts who dominate meetings. They are often the people no one would ever guess have influence because they have no formal power. They are not at the top of the hierarchy. Did you know if these informal leaders leave, the chance of turnover among the remaining staff rises by 500%? How can you retain these people and reward them for being the glue in the team if you don't even know who they are? Most leaders guess incorrectly when asked to name who owns the influence in the informal networks in their organizations. This mirrors my experience.
Listen this episode to hear more stories of the 3 percent rule in context and also learn about the 6 change blockers. We talk about how understanding networks better can help us increase belonging and reduce loneliness and improve diversity.
https://twitter.com/JeppeHansgaard
Jeppe Vilstrup Hansgaard is the driving force behind Innovisor. As the CEO and founder, Jeppe is on a mission to eliminate the all-too-common 'change fiasco' during organizational transformations, emphasizing the value of people as an organization's greatest asset.
Jeppe is a thought leader who enjoys sharing his insights with the change community through blog posts, articles, and tweets. He's a sought-after speaker, captivating audiences in executive groups, leadership programs, and MBA programs at renowned business schools. Jeppe is the author behind the best-selling "Now What?"-playbooks for leaders, change and OD professionals, and Management Consultants. The playbooks are practical and packed with anecdotes, case studies, facts, tips & tricks.
Jeppe earned his Executive MBA from Henley Business School in the UK and further enriched his knowledge with courses from Stanford School of Professional Development in the USA.
Jeppe is a proud father of three kids and lives in Denmark with his wife & family.
'Change is Gridlocked! Now What?' can be pre-ordered here with a 50% discount. https://lnkd.in/dyjbfEqb
Releasing in June, this episode is a nice preview.
ThreePercentRule - Innovisor SixChangeBlockers - Innovisor
This post was inspired by a conversation I had with Tom Goodwin that started on Twitter and which he expanded on LinkedIn.
He gave me permission to base this podcast episode on these posts.
I often think a lot about how lucky I am to have started my career with 25 ish years of in-office/store work, passive training, oversight, exposure via proximity, and camaraderie . This is by no means an anti-remote work thing, it's just an honest reflection on the head start being in a packed workplace from the age of 17 onwards. Something not everyone now gets. And yes I was lucky to feel like I (nearly) always worked at places that were high energy, that were dominated by quite supportive people, that I had great bosses, that had pretty motivated people, varied work, and the long hours were rewarding. But it wasn't 100% luck, it was a concerted effort to pick places on the basis of how I'd develop, not what I'd get paid. And I'm not suggesting companies should resort to 100% in person work, but I do think they should focus on creating environments where people feel a part of something, and supported.
On Twitter, I told him that I was not fortunate to have that type of supportive work environment - I had monitoring, close surveillance, mandatory training and micromanagement.
Tom asked me something which stopped me short.
"Why didn't you leave?"
The short answer I gave was kids, a mortgage and stability. But it's deeper than that. The choices and decisions I made about the companies I worked for and the jobs I accepted are rooted in my childhood perception of stability and responsibility, where I lived, the kind of daughter, parent and wife I wanted to be, the economic climate, golden handcuffs including access to work from home which was not common at the time and systematic limitations.
Condensing 30 years of decisions and history into less than15 minutes is a challenging task. Hopefully you find it interesting to view my career from a high level perspective.
I used Microsoft Co-pilot to summarize valuable lessons others could learn from my story and I kind of like the output. It feels a bit like a personal cheerleader who can see the positives peeking throught the details.
Here are some valuable lessons that others can learn from your story:
Resilience and Adaptability:
Navigating Career Transitions:
Advocacy and Impact:
Mindset Matters:
Balancing Personal and Professional Life:
Unique Paths to Success:
Let me tell you a story 50 years in the making.
I moved to the Town of Georgina when I was 18 months old. I've lived here 50 years.
We've never had much tech infrastructure so I can't tell you how excited I was to learn that our new community centre has an audio and video recording studio I can use for podcasting.
I thought it would be a simple matter to get someone from the town on my podcast to talk about the MURC (Multi-Use Recreation Centre). Not so. It's an ongoing adventure.
This episode lays the groundwork - my personal history, media and journalism in small towns in Ontario, PR for politicians and a surprise cameo from my first employer. And drama surrounding gender neutral change rooms and Facebook. It's a simple rule - don't get naked in public - that has the town confused.
This is for all the people who have ever asked me about the Keswick dinner jacket. We are so much more. A hotbed of podcasters, the forefront of skills development. Eventually - if the software ever gets installed.
In this episode, I share my personal stories to illustrate the importance of appreciation and recognition in the workplace and how easy it is to get it wrong even with the best of intentions. I also talk about why some of the common practices of employee appreciation are ineffective and how we can do better.
Key TakeawaysThank you for listening and I'll see you in the next episode.
In this episode, Nola Simon shares her personal stories about the benefits of working a four day work week. She talks about how her husband's experience with a flexible and creative job at a pattern making shop in Toronto inspired her to challenge the conventional narratives about work and productivity. She also reflects on how having an extra day off every week improved their quality of life and relationship.
Key Takeaways
The four-day workweek is an arrangement where employees or students work or attend school for four days instead of five, while maintaining the same pay or hours. This concept has gained popularity in recent years as a way to improve work-life balance, productivity, and well-being. Here are some articles that discuss the benefits and challenges of the four-day workweek:
Thank you for listening and I'll see you in the next episode.
In this episode, I share my personal experience and insights on how to manage up effectively in a hybrid remote work setting. I explain what managing up means, why it is important, and how it can benefit both you and your manager. I also give some practical examples of how I managed up with my manager who had never worked from home before, and how I advocated for the needs and challenges of remote workers in team and divisional meetings. If you want to learn how to collaborate better with your manager and other leaders in your organization, this episode is for you.
Episode Timestamps:Thank you for listening and I'll see you in the next episode.
Coffee Badging: A Trend in Hybrid Workplaces
In the world of hybrid work, a curious phenomenon has emerged: coffee badging. It's not about java aficionados collecting stamps on their loyalty cards; rather, it's a sly workaround for employees who are less than thrilled about returning to the office.
Here's the scoop: Coffee badging involves employees showing up at the workplace just long enough to swipe their building ID, grab a cup of coffee, exchange pleasantries, and then promptly head home—akin to an Irish goodbye. According to a study by Owl Labs, nearly 60% of on-site workers have tried this tactic1.
But why the covert coffee run? Let's explore the motivations behind this trend and how organizations might address it:
Forced Office Return: Many employees harbor reservations about returning to the office. Some workplaces have become toxic due to disgruntled colleagues. Even those who don't mind being in the office engage in coffee badging to avoid the negativity. The key question: Are they still productive elsewhere? How does this impact the team relationships and trust?1.
Rewarding the Wrong Behavior: Some companies inadvertently reinforce the idea that visibility equals success. Employees feel pressured to be seen physically, even if it doesn't enhance productivity. Managers who prioritize presence over results inadvertently encourage coffee badging. The fix? Evaluate performance based on effort and outcomes, not mere face time1.
Deviant Conformity: Coffee badging falls into the category of deviant conformity. Employees conform to the letter of the policy (swiping in) while flouting its spirit (not fully engaging in office work). This behavior often arises from dissatisfaction with poorly designed policies. Organizations should revisit their mandates to ensure alignment with employee needs and expectations1.
In summary, coffee badging reflects a nuanced response to workplace policies. While it may irk some managers, understanding the underlying reasons can guide better policy design. So, whether you're a coffee badger or a policy maker, consider the balance between compliance and genuine engagement in the evolving world of work.
I first connected with Gavin because I noticed he was born in Keswick, UK. I live in Keswick, Ontario, Canada. They are spelled the same but pronounced differently. This is known as affinity bias - I notice something about you that is similar to my own experience. It's a tiny story that connects.
Gavin and I both love the power of storytelling. It's essential for the future of work and key to distributed work (hybrid/remote).
I'd go as far as to say it's the future of leadership.
Join us to understand why. Also, check out Gavin's newsletter on LinkedIn. He is a visual thinker and although we forgot to talk about his artistic take on leadership, it's the doodles that make his newsletter resonate. There's a reason it's featured so often by LinkedIn editors. He works in partnership with Eugene Yoon to craft these visuals. - link at the bottom of the shownotes. Don't forget to rate, review and comment. We'd love to hear your insights and stories too. Gavin McMahonGavin partners with clients to create tailored learning programs. He is rumored to build and run practical, entertaining workshops. He leads the development of newfangled leadership and customer experience products.
Gavin's early career crosses the defense, automotive, publishing, and technology industries. He worked in engineering, strategy, and senior product development roles.
Gavin graduated from UCLAN with a B(Eng) Hons. in Mechanical Engineering. He served as a platoon commander after graduating from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.
After a short stint in the defense industry and working in Africa, Gavin made a career change. A Sainsbury Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, he went on to study at Institute Theseus in France. There, he graduated with an MBA in Innovation, Strategy & Information Technology.
Gavin was a founding member of the London Business School's i:Lab. There he co-wrote the case study: Netscape Communications Corporation. One of the first digital case studies, Netscape charted the rise of the first Internet giant. The case featured in MBA and executive education programs at Harvard, London Business School, and INSEAD.
Gavin is a proud father of two very handsome basset hounds (and kids).
Gavin McMahon | LinkedIn
(1) fassforward: Posts | LinkedIn
Leadership & Storytelling Training | fassforward | New York
Foward Thinking - Gavin's LinkedIn newsletter
From the publisher's feed