
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Megan Tobias Neely is a sociologist whose book Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street takes a deep look inside the world of hedge funds, those small boutique investment banks that play with a sizable chunk of the world's wealth. Neely's book draws on her observations from time working in a hedge fund as well as from dozens of interviews with professionals in the industry. In this conversation, we discuss:
- How hedge fund managers justify their value to society and why there are reasons to doubt them
- The internal culture of firms and how they resemble feudal kingdoms
- Popular myths, such as the idea that the "only thing that matters is whether you make money for investors" and "the firm is horizontal and non-hierarchical"
- How people with degrees in astrophysics and artificial intelligence find themselves using their skills to make money for rich people rather than doing what they love
- How super-wealthy men convince themselves that their decisions are based on objective reason when they are often based in stereotypes and prejudice
- How a savvy actor with access to capital can actually take advantage of these blind spots through "perception arbitrage"
The Bloomberg article by Matt Levine that Nathan cites is here. The review of Ray Dalio's Principles is here.
4.6
617617 ratings
Megan Tobias Neely is a sociologist whose book Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street takes a deep look inside the world of hedge funds, those small boutique investment banks that play with a sizable chunk of the world's wealth. Neely's book draws on her observations from time working in a hedge fund as well as from dozens of interviews with professionals in the industry. In this conversation, we discuss:
- How hedge fund managers justify their value to society and why there are reasons to doubt them
- The internal culture of firms and how they resemble feudal kingdoms
- Popular myths, such as the idea that the "only thing that matters is whether you make money for investors" and "the firm is horizontal and non-hierarchical"
- How people with degrees in astrophysics and artificial intelligence find themselves using their skills to make money for rich people rather than doing what they love
- How super-wealthy men convince themselves that their decisions are based on objective reason when they are often based in stereotypes and prejudice
- How a savvy actor with access to capital can actually take advantage of these blind spots through "perception arbitrage"
The Bloomberg article by Matt Levine that Nathan cites is here. The review of Ray Dalio's Principles is here.
494 Listeners
1,425 Listeners
1,473 Listeners
1,549 Listeners
416 Listeners
6,114 Listeners
3,878 Listeners
177 Listeners
1,961 Listeners
2,689 Listeners
264 Listeners
899 Listeners
535 Listeners
285 Listeners
444 Listeners