
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Megan Tobias Neely is a sociologist whose book Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street takes a deep look inside the world of hedge funds, those small boutique investment banks that play with a sizable chunk of the world's wealth. Neely's book draws on her observations from time working in a hedge fund as well as from dozens of interviews with professionals in the industry. In this conversation, we discuss:
- How hedge fund managers justify their value to society and why there are reasons to doubt them
- The internal culture of firms and how they resemble feudal kingdoms
- Popular myths, such as the idea that the "only thing that matters is whether you make money for investors" and "the firm is horizontal and non-hierarchical"
- How people with degrees in astrophysics and artificial intelligence find themselves using their skills to make money for rich people rather than doing what they love
- How super-wealthy men convince themselves that their decisions are based on objective reason when they are often based in stereotypes and prejudice
- How a savvy actor with access to capital can actually take advantage of these blind spots through "perception arbitrage"
The Bloomberg article by Matt Levine that Nathan cites is here. The review of Ray Dalio's Principles is here.
By Current Affairs4.6
618618 ratings
Megan Tobias Neely is a sociologist whose book Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street takes a deep look inside the world of hedge funds, those small boutique investment banks that play with a sizable chunk of the world's wealth. Neely's book draws on her observations from time working in a hedge fund as well as from dozens of interviews with professionals in the industry. In this conversation, we discuss:
- How hedge fund managers justify their value to society and why there are reasons to doubt them
- The internal culture of firms and how they resemble feudal kingdoms
- Popular myths, such as the idea that the "only thing that matters is whether you make money for investors" and "the firm is horizontal and non-hierarchical"
- How people with degrees in astrophysics and artificial intelligence find themselves using their skills to make money for rich people rather than doing what they love
- How super-wealthy men convince themselves that their decisions are based on objective reason when they are often based in stereotypes and prejudice
- How a savvy actor with access to capital can actually take advantage of these blind spots through "perception arbitrage"
The Bloomberg article by Matt Levine that Nathan cites is here. The review of Ray Dalio's Principles is here.

1,992 Listeners

519 Listeners

1,459 Listeners

1,593 Listeners

6,112 Listeners

3,917 Listeners

183 Listeners

2,071 Listeners

2,709 Listeners

288 Listeners

1,066 Listeners

560 Listeners

352 Listeners

474 Listeners