Join co-hosts Dan and Hanna as they dive into challenging task of determining the quality of scientific papers.

Throughout the discussion, they touch on common misconceptions surrounding the peer review process, the importance of reputable journals, and the significance of citation metrics like impact factors. They share real-life examples, including infamous cases of scientific fraud, and emphasize the risks of relying solely on journal reputation without examining the quality of the work itself.

The episode also highlights the evolving landscape of science communication, particularly in the age of social media, discussing the role of scientists on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Dan and Hanna address the challenges researchers face in effectively communicating their findings to the public and ponder the importance of verifying sources in an age of information overload.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.