
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court began hearing arguments on Moore v. Harper this week, a case that involves North Carolina’s Republican led-state legislatures efforts to pass gerrymandered maps. After the 2020 Census, North Carolina’s Supreme Court threw out maps that had been drawn by the state legislature. In this case, Republican members of the North Carolina legislature are suing, arguing that the Constitution gives them sole authority to administer federal elections. The ruling will have important implications for the structure of American democracy.
We speak with Allison Riggs, co-executive director and chief counsel for voting rights for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice and Ari Berman, senior reporter at Mother Jones, about the latest proceedings in the case, and the potential implications of The Supreme Court's decision.
By WNYC and PRX4.6
1414 ratings
The Supreme Court began hearing arguments on Moore v. Harper this week, a case that involves North Carolina’s Republican led-state legislatures efforts to pass gerrymandered maps. After the 2020 Census, North Carolina’s Supreme Court threw out maps that had been drawn by the state legislature. In this case, Republican members of the North Carolina legislature are suing, arguing that the Constitution gives them sole authority to administer federal elections. The ruling will have important implications for the structure of American democracy.
We speak with Allison Riggs, co-executive director and chief counsel for voting rights for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice and Ari Berman, senior reporter at Mother Jones, about the latest proceedings in the case, and the potential implications of The Supreme Court's decision.

11,636 Listeners

321 Listeners

942 Listeners

8,468 Listeners

463 Listeners

311 Listeners

3,780 Listeners

326 Listeners

1,910 Listeners

1,558 Listeners