The Heritage Foundation’s Blueprint: Repackaging Oppression as Family Values

A Calculated Vision, Not a Slip of the Tongue

The Heritage Foundation’s recent policy manifesto, “Saving America by Saving the Family,” is not an isolated incident of extreme rhetoric but a calculated continuation of a long-term strategy to reshape American society. The document proposes draconian measures that would strip away rights under the guise of protecting family values, including making divorce difficult, criminalizing adultery, and rolling back civil rights protections. This blueprint reflects a clear and present intention by Heritage to enforce a regressive vision of society, rooted deeply in Christian nationalist ideology.

Institutional Power and Its Enablers

Heritage’s empowerment of Scott Yenor, the chair of its American Citizenship Initiative, is a deliberate decision to anchor their regressive policies in institutional power. The foundation’s alignment with Yenor’s views under their “One Voice” doctrine reveals a unified, uncompromising stance towards redefining American citizenship and rights. This is not merely about individual beliefs but about how Heritage, supported by billionaire donors and influential political figures, is attempting to institutionalize these beliefs.

The Misdirection of Blame and Responsibility

The framing of societal decline on the autonomy of women and the rights of LGBTQ+ communities is a calculated misdirection. By labeling the pursuit of personal freedoms as the cause of a “birth dearth,” Heritage shifts blame away from policy failures and economic conditions that affect family stability and growth. This tactic diverts public discourse from substantive economic and social policies to culture war issues, manipulating public perception and policy direction.

The Larger Pattern: A Continuation of the Powell Memo’s Legacy

The Heritage Foundation’s actions are part of a larger pattern of billionaire-funded influence on American politics, dating back to the strategies outlined in the 1971 Powell Memo. This blueprint for conservative dominance in American public life has guided organizations like Heritage to pursue a hard-right agenda under the facade of economic and family values. The continuity of funding and ideological guidance from wealthy conservative families underscores a persistent effort to mold American society in a way that protects wealth and power at the expense of democratic principles and civil rights.

Conclusion: Democracy at a Crossroads

The Heritage Foundation’s manifesto is a stark reminder of the ongoing battle for the future of American democracy. It’s not just about one policy or one appointment; it’s about a sustained, well-funded effort to alter the fabric of American society. As Heritage and similar entities push their agenda, the response must not only challenge individual policies but also address the broader assault on democratic values and the manipulation of public policy by private wealth. Recognizing and confronting this strategy is crucial for anyone invested in preserving a democratic society that values diversity and equality over theocratic and oligarchic control.

Get full access to Systemic Error at paulstsmith.substack.com/subscribe