November 07, 2024

HPR4244: Two methods of digitizing photos.

9 minutes

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.

Today I will talk about digitizing analog photos. I will talk about

two methods.

I have scanners from different manufacturers, flat bed scanner and

dedicated film scanner. Each scanner is delivered with software. Each

software is generally good. But it is a problem to manage several

software. Secondly, none of them works for Linux operating system. I

wanted to simplify my software learning, so I wanted one software for

all my existing and any future scanner. Secondly I intended to migrate

to a Linux operating system, which I now have done.

Those two requirements lead me to switch over to VueScan software. I

had tested VueScan before and also gotten recommendations from

photographic friends. VueScan is a proprietary software made by a small

family run company. It’s available for Linux, Windows and macOS. VueScan

supports very many hardware scanners. I do not know about any better

software for Linux and is maybe also the best choice for any operating

system. I do not regret my switch to VueScan.

A second method to digitize photos is reproduction with a camera.

That is to use a camera to shoot a photo of the photo.

Some say it is the superior technology. I don’t know. But as I am

coming from the scanning technology and starting to explore the repro

technology, I will give my early thoughts from that perspective.

My initial plan has been to use repro photography for prints that are

glued into albums and therefore difficult to manage in the scanner. It

is also an excellent method to digitize other papers in book format. But

I have not really started to do that.

However, a while ago I started to look into 6x9 cm negatives. My

scanner can just manage 6x9. But I do not have a fixture for 6x9. So it

is both somewhat tricky to position the negative as well as to keep it

flat. A thin plexiglass plate might be possible to use to keep it flat.

Even without plexiglass, I have tested I can get well acceptable result

with the scanner.

I started to try out the repro method. I have not come so far in my

trials that I can decide which is the best method for me.

My camera is a modest camera compared to state of the art. My flat

bed scanner should give better or comparable resolution than my modest

digital camera. The fixture I have for repro do not keep the negative

fully flat, because 6x9 is a rather big size. So I plan to explore if I

can improve quality with a plexiglass plate above the negative.

An issue with the repro method is to keep all angles in control, to

mount the camera in exactly correct angle in relation to the object.

Focus can also be another issue. I consider it is better to use manual

focus rather than auto focus. When I take the repro photos, I have the

camera connected to a laptop and I use the Entangle software to control

the camera settings. I can use the camera live view to position the

object as well as to focus.

I use RawTherapee software to convert the negative photo to a normal

photo. RawTherapee comes with pre-installed profiles for this process.

The default profile values can be adjusted and also stored as new

personal profiles.

A major advantage of the repro method compared to the scanner method

is the speed. Once all is configured, it takes one hundred of a second

or so to do the digitize itself, while it can take minutes with the

scanner.

I use digiKam as my photo catalog software.

All software I currently use with the exception of VueScan are free

and open source. I use all on Linux operating system, some of them are

available on other platforms. I include links to their websites in the

show notes.

If you have any opinion or experience on digitizing analog photos, I

will be happy to read your comments or listen to your show.

Software

VueScan: https://www.hamrick.com/

Entangle: https://entangle-photo.org/

RawTherapee: https://rawtherapee.com/

digiKam: https://www.digikam.org/

Provide feedback on this episode.

...more

View all episodes

By Hacker Public Radio

4.2

3434 ratings