
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A while back I did a research project looking at almost 10,000 raw captures in my Lightroom catalog. I wanted to determine what caused a failed image to fail, technologically. I did not consider aesthetics but rather the mechanics of photography. My hope was that I could eliminate or at least reduce those technical failures. Two primary failures dominated all others. The number one failure was camera movement, easily resolved with faster shutter speeds or tripods. The second most common reason for failure was related to depth of field, and in a surprising way.
Show your appreciation for our free weekly Podcast and our free daily Here's a Thought… with a donation Thanks!
By Brooks Jensen4.6
439439 ratings
A while back I did a research project looking at almost 10,000 raw captures in my Lightroom catalog. I wanted to determine what caused a failed image to fail, technologically. I did not consider aesthetics but rather the mechanics of photography. My hope was that I could eliminate or at least reduce those technical failures. Two primary failures dominated all others. The number one failure was camera movement, easily resolved with faster shutter speeds or tripods. The second most common reason for failure was related to depth of field, and in a surprising way.
Show your appreciation for our free weekly Podcast and our free daily Here's a Thought… with a donation Thanks!

667 Listeners

264 Listeners

2,018 Listeners

9,622 Listeners

2,013 Listeners

56 Listeners

55 Listeners

293 Listeners

40 Listeners

123 Listeners

115 Listeners

13 Listeners

101 Listeners

5,485 Listeners

139 Listeners