
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A while back I did a research project looking at almost 10,000 raw captures in my Lightroom catalog. I wanted to determine what caused a failed image to fail, technologically. I did not consider aesthetics but rather the mechanics of photography. My hope was that I could eliminate or at least reduce those technical failures. Two primary failures dominated all others. The number one failure was camera movement, easily resolved with faster shutter speeds or tripods. The second most common reason for failure was related to depth of field, and in a surprising way.
Show your appreciation for our free weekly Podcast and our free daily Here's a Thought… with a donation Thanks!
By Brooks Jensen4.6
439439 ratings
A while back I did a research project looking at almost 10,000 raw captures in my Lightroom catalog. I wanted to determine what caused a failed image to fail, technologically. I did not consider aesthetics but rather the mechanics of photography. My hope was that I could eliminate or at least reduce those technical failures. Two primary failures dominated all others. The number one failure was camera movement, easily resolved with faster shutter speeds or tripods. The second most common reason for failure was related to depth of field, and in a surprising way.
Show your appreciation for our free weekly Podcast and our free daily Here's a Thought… with a donation Thanks!

664 Listeners

264 Listeners

2,018 Listeners

9,746 Listeners

2,012 Listeners

58 Listeners

55 Listeners

295 Listeners

39 Listeners

124 Listeners

115 Listeners

12 Listeners

101 Listeners

5,651 Listeners

141 Listeners