Send us a text

Challenging conventional wisdom, I take you through my controversial but pragmatic approach to real estate. Despite owning millions in rental properties, I've made the strategic choice to rent my own home—and there's solid financial logic behind this decision.

The current real estate market presents a perfect storm of challenges: sky-high interest rates, inflated property values, and diminishing affordability. For $2,000 a month in Milwaukee, my rental provides flexibility that would require significant sacrifice or capital to match as a homeowner. Rather than sinking funds into an overpriced primary residence, I'm deploying that capital where it generates better returns—in my investment portfolio.

This approach offers something invaluable that never appears in traditional investment calculations: peace of mind. Financial mobility means having resources available when opportunities arise or emergencies strike. Physical mobility means I'm not anchored to a property that might take months to sell if life circumstances change. Together, these freedoms provide a security that overextended homeowners simply don't have.

Society constantly pushes the narrative that homeownership equals success—that taking on massive mortgage debt somehow represents achievement. I've bought and sold houses before, so I'm not anti-homeownership, but I refuse to participate in what feels like financial theater. A house that drains your finances is more liability than asset, regardless of what conventional wisdom suggests.

For those starting their real estate journey, consider whether pouring everything into your primary residence truly serves your long-term goals. Sometimes patience is the most powerful investment strategy. Don't let Instagram-driven pressure push you into decisions that limit your financial freedom for decades to come. What housing choices have you made that went against conventional wisdom but served you well?