
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Chain of Thought: From Descartes to Machine Minds Hosted by Nathan Rigoni
In this episode we travel from the candle‑lit study of 17th‑century Descartes, who stripped away every belief to find the one certainty “I think, therefore I am,” to today’s glowing screens where large language models generate their own inner monologue. How does the age‑old philosophical quest for self‑knowledge map onto a model that writes “Let’s think step‑by‑step” and then follows its own reasoning chain? Can a machine’s recursive self‑talk be considered true thought, or is it merely sophisticated pattern matching? Join us as we untangle the threads of doubt, recursion, and chain‑of‑thought prompting to ask whether AI can ever achieve a genuine inner voice.
What you will learn
Resources mentioned
Why this episode matters
Understanding how LLMs construct and follow a chain of thought bridges the gap between classic epistemology and modern AI. Grasping these recursive reasoning patterns not only improves model performance on complex tasks, but also forces us to confront deeper questions about consciousness, agency, and what it truly means to “think.” As AI systems become partners in decision‑making, having a clear picture of their inner processes is essential for responsible deployment, ethical design, and informed public discourse.
Subscribe for more philosophical deep dives, visit www.phronesis-analytics.com, or email [email protected].
Keywords: chain of thought, recursion, REACT framework, large language models, prompt engineering, AI self‑awareness, consciousness, René Descartes, “I think therefore I am”, system 1 system 2, philosophical AI, artificial intelligence reasoning.
By Nathan RigoniChain of Thought: From Descartes to Machine Minds Hosted by Nathan Rigoni
In this episode we travel from the candle‑lit study of 17th‑century Descartes, who stripped away every belief to find the one certainty “I think, therefore I am,” to today’s glowing screens where large language models generate their own inner monologue. How does the age‑old philosophical quest for self‑knowledge map onto a model that writes “Let’s think step‑by‑step” and then follows its own reasoning chain? Can a machine’s recursive self‑talk be considered true thought, or is it merely sophisticated pattern matching? Join us as we untangle the threads of doubt, recursion, and chain‑of‑thought prompting to ask whether AI can ever achieve a genuine inner voice.
What you will learn
Resources mentioned
Why this episode matters
Understanding how LLMs construct and follow a chain of thought bridges the gap between classic epistemology and modern AI. Grasping these recursive reasoning patterns not only improves model performance on complex tasks, but also forces us to confront deeper questions about consciousness, agency, and what it truly means to “think.” As AI systems become partners in decision‑making, having a clear picture of their inner processes is essential for responsible deployment, ethical design, and informed public discourse.
Subscribe for more philosophical deep dives, visit www.phronesis-analytics.com, or email [email protected].
Keywords: chain of thought, recursion, REACT framework, large language models, prompt engineering, AI self‑awareness, consciousness, René Descartes, “I think therefore I am”, system 1 system 2, philosophical AI, artificial intelligence reasoning.