
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Back in 2009, when I started working in fraud prevention at PayPal, we had this saying: “Good people leave tracks.”
And honestly, that was kind of the whole job.
Fraudsters tried to erase themselves. Fake identities, disposable emails, wiped browser cookies, brand-new accounts. Legitimate users, meanwhile, usually left digital breadcrumbs everywhere because nobody really thought much about online privacy back then.
So yes, part of the job was basically social media investigation.
And honestly, I got weirdly good at it.
In this episode, I tell the story of how a random Facebook profile picture, a colonial-looking building, and an old backpacking trip through Vietnam helped us approve a transaction that initially looked like obvious fraud.
Now, if listening to that story makes you cringe a little, good. It should.
The bigger conversation here is not really about Facebook stalking. It is about how fraud prevention changed once online privacy, customer privacy, and data privacy became much more serious priorities across the internet.
And now we have this strange tradeoff.
As private citizens, most of us are probably happy that publicly available information is harder to access than it was 15 years ago. But as fraud professionals, we also lost a huge amount of visibility that once helped us understand identity intelligence, behavior patterns, and fraud risk.
Not a simple problem.
What you’ll hear in this episode:A conversation that starts with an old-school fraud investigation story that turns into a broader discussion about whether losing access to personal data may have actually protected us in the long run.
Who should listen:Anyone interested in social media OSINT, online privacy, identity intelligence, or open source intelligence techniques.
Basically, if you ever used Facebook like an investigative database, this episode is probably going to make you a little uncomfortable.
By Chen ZamirBack in 2009, when I started working in fraud prevention at PayPal, we had this saying: “Good people leave tracks.”
And honestly, that was kind of the whole job.
Fraudsters tried to erase themselves. Fake identities, disposable emails, wiped browser cookies, brand-new accounts. Legitimate users, meanwhile, usually left digital breadcrumbs everywhere because nobody really thought much about online privacy back then.
So yes, part of the job was basically social media investigation.
And honestly, I got weirdly good at it.
In this episode, I tell the story of how a random Facebook profile picture, a colonial-looking building, and an old backpacking trip through Vietnam helped us approve a transaction that initially looked like obvious fraud.
Now, if listening to that story makes you cringe a little, good. It should.
The bigger conversation here is not really about Facebook stalking. It is about how fraud prevention changed once online privacy, customer privacy, and data privacy became much more serious priorities across the internet.
And now we have this strange tradeoff.
As private citizens, most of us are probably happy that publicly available information is harder to access than it was 15 years ago. But as fraud professionals, we also lost a huge amount of visibility that once helped us understand identity intelligence, behavior patterns, and fraud risk.
Not a simple problem.
What you’ll hear in this episode:A conversation that starts with an old-school fraud investigation story that turns into a broader discussion about whether losing access to personal data may have actually protected us in the long run.
Who should listen:Anyone interested in social media OSINT, online privacy, identity intelligence, or open source intelligence techniques.
Basically, if you ever used Facebook like an investigative database, this episode is probably going to make you a little uncomfortable.