
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Download the Enterprise Leader’s Guide to Cybersecurity Resilience for free: https://tuxcare.com/downloadables/the-enterprise-leaders-guide-to-cybersecurity-resilience/?utm_campaign=The Linux Experiment&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=social
👏 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@thelinuxexp/join
Or, you can donate whatever you want:
👕 GET TLE MERCH
Timestamps:
Ok, when you're wrong, you're wrong. And I was completely wrong about GNOME and touchscreens. In my previous video, I blasted GNOME for being barely usable with touchscreens, because, well, it was, in my experience.
Turns out, I didn't go deep enough. This was all Ubuntu's fault.
I went with Fedora 41 and its very default version of GNOME. On Fedora, I had tiling working by just dragging windows to the edges, something that Ubuntu didn't have, likely due to their own tiling extension they added, that doesn't work well.
I also could long press on elements of the desktop or inside of apps, and I got a stable right click menu that didn't disappear after I lifted my finger, again, something that didn't work inside Ubuntu, a-even with all the drivers installed.
I also could open menubars inside of apps that have them. What didn't work though, was the onscreen keyboard inside of KDE applications.
Another thing that didn't work on Ubuntu, but did in Fedora is swiping on the app grid, anywhere.
I used Fedora's Plasma mobile spin for this one, and It's a very good experience.
Swiping from the top edge opens quick settings, that let you access a LOT of the settings you'd need, it's great, apart from the scrolling test inside each one which makes it look very busy. I guess it's aimed more at smartphones, and doesn't resize that well on bigger devices.
Default apps are perfectly sized and suited for touch, with clear interfaces, easy to use, big buttons, it's nice. Opening full size desktop apps also works well, with menubars even being resized and enlarged, although for large menus, it makes it a bit annoying to navigate.
Phosh is installable on fedora, so that's what I did, and I could just pick it as an option from the login manager. I won't go over it for too long because it's basically just the GNOME shell with very small adaptations, and it's clearly not meant for laptops / big screens.
After that, swiping from the top edge of the screen brings the notifications and quick settings that occupy the entire screen, which is unnecessary àon a big screen like this, but coherent on a smartphone. These toggles can be expanded using the mobile settings app that phosh comes with.
So, first, mea maxima culpa for GNOME: it is indeed very good, it's just htat Ubuntu destroys its touch capabilities with changes they make to GNOME. Second, Plasma Mobile is really nice, even on 2 in 1s, although I still prefer the regular KDE Plasma for a 2 in 1?. Plasma mobile is excellent for tablets, and presumable for phones, if they mange to run it as competently and smoothly as this laptop does.
By Download the Enterprise Leader’s Guide to Cybersecurity Resilience for free: https://tuxcare.com/downloadables/the-enterprise-leaders-guide-to-cybersecurity-resilience/?utm_campaign=The Linux Experiment&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=social
👏 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@thelinuxexp/join
Or, you can donate whatever you want:
👕 GET TLE MERCH
Timestamps:
Ok, when you're wrong, you're wrong. And I was completely wrong about GNOME and touchscreens. In my previous video, I blasted GNOME for being barely usable with touchscreens, because, well, it was, in my experience.
Turns out, I didn't go deep enough. This was all Ubuntu's fault.
I went with Fedora 41 and its very default version of GNOME. On Fedora, I had tiling working by just dragging windows to the edges, something that Ubuntu didn't have, likely due to their own tiling extension they added, that doesn't work well.
I also could long press on elements of the desktop or inside of apps, and I got a stable right click menu that didn't disappear after I lifted my finger, again, something that didn't work inside Ubuntu, a-even with all the drivers installed.
I also could open menubars inside of apps that have them. What didn't work though, was the onscreen keyboard inside of KDE applications.
Another thing that didn't work on Ubuntu, but did in Fedora is swiping on the app grid, anywhere.
I used Fedora's Plasma mobile spin for this one, and It's a very good experience.
Swiping from the top edge opens quick settings, that let you access a LOT of the settings you'd need, it's great, apart from the scrolling test inside each one which makes it look very busy. I guess it's aimed more at smartphones, and doesn't resize that well on bigger devices.
Default apps are perfectly sized and suited for touch, with clear interfaces, easy to use, big buttons, it's nice. Opening full size desktop apps also works well, with menubars even being resized and enlarged, although for large menus, it makes it a bit annoying to navigate.
Phosh is installable on fedora, so that's what I did, and I could just pick it as an option from the login manager. I won't go over it for too long because it's basically just the GNOME shell with very small adaptations, and it's clearly not meant for laptops / big screens.
After that, swiping from the top edge of the screen brings the notifications and quick settings that occupy the entire screen, which is unnecessary àon a big screen like this, but coherent on a smartphone. These toggles can be expanded using the mobile settings app that phosh comes with.
So, first, mea maxima culpa for GNOME: it is indeed very good, it's just htat Ubuntu destroys its touch capabilities with changes they make to GNOME. Second, Plasma Mobile is really nice, even on 2 in 1s, although I still prefer the regular KDE Plasma for a 2 in 1?. Plasma mobile is excellent for tablets, and presumable for phones, if they mange to run it as competently and smoothly as this laptop does.