Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share If Democrats chase power and Republicans chase money, who defends liberty?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
If Democrats chase power and Republicans chase money, who defends liberty?
Send us a text
Start with a simple question: are we getting squeezed by power, money, or both? We trace that pressure across today’s biggest fault lines—AI scam books flooding Amazon, a government shutdown used as a lever for permanent cuts, the messy fight over who gets healthcare benefits, and the quiet advance of digital IDs and IRS AI surveillance. It’s a tour of how incentives really work: ideologues build dependency to solidify power; dealmakers sell flexibility to the highest bidder. Either way, “the little guys” pay in cash, time, and trust.
We unpack a sharp framework for understanding the parties: Democrats pursue power, Republicans pursue money. It’s blunt, but it explains why one side stays united while the other splinters, why programs metastasize, and why clean reversals are rare. That lens clarifies this shutdown: Russ Vogt isn’t playing for a temporary pause; he’s exploring reductions-in-force that shrink agencies beyond easy repair, especially where rulemaking replaced legislation. Meanwhile, Democrats stumble over their own tape on healthcare access for the undocumented, struggling to square past debate-stage pledges with current denials. The results hit real people: WIC recipients anxious about benefits, hospitals squeezed by reimbursement math, and taxpayers living the inflation that subsidies don’t solve.
Then we zoom out. Digital ID regimes promise choice while engineering exclusion—no explicit mandate, just doors that won’t open without compliance. Pair that with IRS AI reportedly scanning bank activity without warrants, and you’ve got a governance model governed by feasibility, not consent. Abroad, we examine the administration’s move to frame strikes on cartel targets as armed conflict, the Venezuela flashpoint, and MAGA’s internal debate: secure borders and kill demand at home, or project force to reshape supply routes? All of it loops back to the same question: what should the federal government do, and how much of your life should require its permission?
If you’re tired of euphemisms and want the receipts, this one’s for you. Hear the clips, challenge the claims, and decide where you stand. If it raises dependency and lowers accountability, it probably isn’t built for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves policy and hates spin, and leave a review with the one moment that changed your mind.
Support the show
https://1776live.us
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
View all episodes
By Taylor JohnatakisSend us a text
Start with a simple question: are we getting squeezed by power, money, or both? We trace that pressure across today’s biggest fault lines—AI scam books flooding Amazon, a government shutdown used as a lever for permanent cuts, the messy fight over who gets healthcare benefits, and the quiet advance of digital IDs and IRS AI surveillance. It’s a tour of how incentives really work: ideologues build dependency to solidify power; dealmakers sell flexibility to the highest bidder. Either way, “the little guys” pay in cash, time, and trust.
We unpack a sharp framework for understanding the parties: Democrats pursue power, Republicans pursue money. It’s blunt, but it explains why one side stays united while the other splinters, why programs metastasize, and why clean reversals are rare. That lens clarifies this shutdown: Russ Vogt isn’t playing for a temporary pause; he’s exploring reductions-in-force that shrink agencies beyond easy repair, especially where rulemaking replaced legislation. Meanwhile, Democrats stumble over their own tape on healthcare access for the undocumented, struggling to square past debate-stage pledges with current denials. The results hit real people: WIC recipients anxious about benefits, hospitals squeezed by reimbursement math, and taxpayers living the inflation that subsidies don’t solve.
Then we zoom out. Digital ID regimes promise choice while engineering exclusion—no explicit mandate, just doors that won’t open without compliance. Pair that with IRS AI reportedly scanning bank activity without warrants, and you’ve got a governance model governed by feasibility, not consent. Abroad, we examine the administration’s move to frame strikes on cartel targets as armed conflict, the Venezuela flashpoint, and MAGA’s internal debate: secure borders and kill demand at home, or project force to reshape supply routes? All of it loops back to the same question: what should the federal government do, and how much of your life should require its permission?
If you’re tired of euphemisms and want the receipts, this one’s for you. Hear the clips, challenge the claims, and decide where you stand. If it raises dependency and lowers accountability, it probably isn’t built for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves policy and hates spin, and leave a review with the one moment that changed your mind.
Support the show
https://1776live.us
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant