Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share in The Matter of Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc. (Copyright law) - US Supreme Court Oral Argument
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
in The Matter of Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc. (Copyright law) - US Supreme Court Oral Argument
Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc.
Facts of the case
When Google implemented its Android Operating System (Android OS), it wrote its own programming language based on Java, which is owned by Oracle. To facilitate developers writing their own programs for Android OS, Google’s version used the same names, organization, and functionality as Java's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).
Oracle sued Google for copyright infringement, but the federal district judge held that APIs are not subject to copyright because permitting a private entity to own the copyright to a programming language would stifle innovation and collaboration, contrary to the goals of copyright. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that the Java APIs are copyrightable but leaving open the possibility of a fair use defense. The U.S. Supreme Court denied Google’s petition for certiorari.
Upon remand to the district court, a jury found that Google's use of the Java API was fair use. Oracle appealed, and the Federal Circuit again reversed the lower court. The Federal Circuit held that Google's use was not fair as a matter of law.
Question
1. Does copyright protection extend to a software interface?
2. If so, does the petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitute fair use?
---------------------------------------------------
For the best DIY legal online visit or partners >>>>
View all episodes
By Attorney at Law
5
11 ratings
Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc.
Facts of the case
When Google implemented its Android Operating System (Android OS), it wrote its own programming language based on Java, which is owned by Oracle. To facilitate developers writing their own programs for Android OS, Google’s version used the same names, organization, and functionality as Java's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).
Oracle sued Google for copyright infringement, but the federal district judge held that APIs are not subject to copyright because permitting a private entity to own the copyright to a programming language would stifle innovation and collaboration, contrary to the goals of copyright. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that the Java APIs are copyrightable but leaving open the possibility of a fair use defense. The U.S. Supreme Court denied Google’s petition for certiorari.
Upon remand to the district court, a jury found that Google's use of the Java API was fair use. Oracle appealed, and the Federal Circuit again reversed the lower court. The Federal Circuit held that Google's use was not fair as a matter of law.
Question
1. Does copyright protection extend to a software interface?
2. If so, does the petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitute fair use?
---------------------------------------------------
For the best DIY legal online visit or partners >>>>