This post gives three arguments for the reason-responsive consequentialist view of rational inquiry.

Inquiry under bounds (Part 4: Justifying the account)

The Brains pod comes from the Brains blog, a leading forum for research in the philosophy and science of mind since about 2005, with over 2000 blog posts drawing over 15,000 visitors per month on average. (Brains also has a YouTube channel with thousands of monthly viewers). If you’re a cognitive scientist who wants to talk about your latest peer-reviewed publications on the podcast, get in touch using our “Contributors” page! If you want to contribute to the costs of hosting our blog, podcast, etc., check out the Patreon and PayPal buttons on our site. And, of course, follow our social feeds to learn what else we’re up to.

Share Inquiry under bounds (Part 4: Justifying the account)

Sign up to save your podcasts

Inquiry under bounds (Part 4: Justifying the account)

Inquiry under bounds (Part 4: Justifying the account)