The Clinton depositions are finished. But if you were expecting answers, you probably didn’t get them.

In this episode of Off Air, Federal Criminal Defense Attorney Ron Chapman explains why the outcome of the deposition may have been predictable from the start.

Ron walks through how the scope of the questioning was limited, why the examiners struggled to push key issues, and which subjects were never raised at all. Those missing topics include the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, and references to Epstein in the Dershowitz sentencing memorandum.

He also explores a larger possibility: that the deposition in Congress may not be where the most serious scrutiny is happening.

In this episode:
 • How the deposition may have been decided before it began
 • The questions Congress never asked the Clintons
 • Epstein’s role in the Clinton Global Initiative referenced in court filings
 • Why federal investigators may still be examining the Clinton Foundation
 • The questions Ron says should have been asked under oath

The hearing may be over, but the larger story may still be unfolding.

Key Takeaways:

00:00 Clinton Deposition Overview
01:48 Why the Deposition Went Wrong
02:36 What a Real Deposition Looks Like
03:18 Attorneys Controlling the Narrative
05:22 How the Clintons Won Early
06:06 Questions Congress Didn’t Ask
07:06 Why the Scope Was Limited
10:52 Epstein & the Clinton Global Initiative
12:12 The FBI Investigation Into the Clintons

Additional Resources:

Official website: https://ronaldwchapman.com/ 

✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations

https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/ 

💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion

https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample 

📲 Follow Ron

X (Twitter): https://x.com/RonChapman 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ron_chapman 

🔔 Hit the bell so you never miss an Off Air episode.

Send a text