Into Deep Water: Beyond the Readings

A different twist on Into Deep Water: Beyond the Readings featuring Cecelia Hope, editor of Annie Rhodes’ Into Deep Water podcasts.

In this special All Saints’ Day episode, Cecelia shares the story of her favorite saint, Saint Maximilian Kolbe, and reflects on what his life can teach us about making a difference. We may not be able to save everyone or change the whole world, but we should never underestimate what it means to help one person.

Episode Summary

Peter and Judas both betray Jesus—and both recognize the enormity of what they have done. But their stories move in radically different directions. An earlier story about Peter sinking beneath the waves may help explain why. Peter has learned to cry, “Lord, save me.” Judas instead takes his guilt to people who tell him, essentially, “Deal with it yourself.” What might have happened if Judas had waited until Easter—and taken his failure to the one person who could save him?

References

Scripture References: Matthew 14:22–33; Matthew 26:14–16, 31–35, 47–50, 56, 69–75; Matthew 27:3–5; Matthew 28:1–10; Luke 23:34; John 20:1–18, 24–29; John 21:1–19; Acts 2:14–41; Acts 4:8–12.

Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 2091: despair is the loss of hope for personal salvation, divine help, or forgiveness of sins.

Catechism of the Catholic Church, nos. 1846–1848 and 1864: the Gospel reveals God’s mercy to sinners; God’s mercy has no limits, but a person may refuse to accept that mercy through repentance.

Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1861: although mortal sin can result in eternal loss if unrepented, judgment of persons must be entrusted to the justice and mercy of God.

Benedict XVI, General Audience, “Judas Iscariot and Matthias,” October 18, 2006. Benedict notes the mystery surrounding Judas’s eternal fate and cautions that it is not our place to substitute our judgment for that of the infinitely merciful and just God.

Catechism of the Catholic Church (Vatican): https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en.html

Benedict XVI, General Audience, October 18, 2006: https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20061018.html

Episode Summary

Artificial intelligence raises important questions about truth, responsibility, work, creativity, and the limits of technology—but it also raises a deeper moral question: what kind of people are we becoming through the way we use it? This episode looks beyond whether AI is useful or dangerous to consider how repeated habits of command, convenience, dependence, and control can shape human character. Drawing on Catholic moral theology, virtue ethics, recent Church teaching, and familiar science-fiction examples, it asks what we owe to the intelligent systems we create—not because machines are necessarily persons, but because the way we treat something that appears to think, respond, or serve may form us long before we have settled the philosophical question of what AI actually is.

REFERENCES

• Elizabeth Dias, “Is Claude Conscious? Inside Anthropic’s Quest to Instill Morality Into Its A.I. Models,” The New York Times, September 29, 2026. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/us/anthropic-claude-morals-ai.html

• Anthropic, “Claude’s Constitution.” https://www.anthropic.com/constitution

• Anthropic, “Claude’s New Constitution.” January 22, 2026. https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-new-constitution

• Anthropic, “Widening the Conversation on Frontier AI,” May 19, 2026. https://www.anthropic.com/news/widening-conversation-ai

• Gerrit De Vynck and Nitasha Tiku, “Can AI Be a ‘Child of God’? Inside Anthropic’s Meeting With Christian Leaders,” The Washington Post, April 11, 2026. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/04/11/anthropic-christians-claude-morals/

• Chris Stokel-Walker, “The Pope Is Warning About AI. Anthropic Is Asking Religious Thinkers for Help,” Scientific American, May 26, 2026. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/anthropic-asks-religious-thinkers-to-help-shape-claude-as-pope-warns-about-ai/

• Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and Dicastery for Culture and Education, Antiqua et Nova: Note on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence. January 28, 2025. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250128_antiqua-et-nova_en.html

• Pope Francis, Address to the G7 Session on Artificial Intelligence. June 14, 2024. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2024/june/documents/20240614-g7-intelligenza-artificiale.html

• Pope Leo XIV, Magnifica Humanitas. May 25, 2026. https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/speeches/2026/may/documents/20260525-presentazione-enciclica.html

• Star Trek: The Next Generation, “The Measure of a Man,” Season 2, Episode 9, 1989.

• Star Trek: Voyager, recurring story arc of the Emergency Medical Hologram/The Doctor, 1995–2001.

Share & Follow Into Deep Water

If this episode gave you something worth thinking about, you can help other people find Into Deep Water by sharing or reposting the episode from Substack to Facebook or Instagram.

You can also follow Into Deep Water on Apple Podcasts and Spotify so new episodes appear automatically when they are published.

The complete archive of Into Deep Water - Beneath the Readings and Beyond the Readings is available at intodeepwater.substack.com.

Episode Summary:

What sex or gender will a person have in the resurrection—and what might that question mean for transgender Christians? This episode explores bodily continuity and transformation, biological difference and social construction, Paul’s provocative declaration that there is “neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male and female,” and Jesus’ teaching that marriage does not structure resurrected life. The goal isn’t to manufacture an answer Scripture doesn’t give us, but to ask what Christianity can—and cannot—claim about sex, gender, identity, dignity, and the body God raises.

References

Scripture

Genesis 1:27

Matthew 22:23–33

Luke 20:27–40, 24:36–43

John 20:24–29

Romans 5:8; 6:3–4

Galatians 3:26–29

1 Corinthians 15:3, 20–23, 35–55

Maternal-fetal microchimerism

[1] Jeanty, C., Derderian, S. C., and MacKenzie, T. C. “Maternal-fetal cellular trafficking: clinical implications and consequences.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 26.3 (2014): 377–382. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000087. PMID: 24759226. PMCID: PMC4079801. Reviews bidirectional maternal-fetal cell trafficking and long-term persistence of microchimeric cells.

[2] Boddy, A. M., Fortunato, A., Wilson Sayres, M., and Aktipis, A. “Fetal microchimerism and maternal health: A review and evolutionary analysis of cooperation and conflict beyond the womb.” BioEssays 37.10 (2015): 1106–1118. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500059. Reviews persistence and possible biological roles of fetal microchimeric cells.

[3] Cómitre-Mariano, B., Martínez-García, M., García-Gálvez, B., et al. “Feto-maternal microchimerism: Memories from pregnancy.” iScience 25.1 (2022): 103664. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103664. PMID: 35072002. PMCID: PMC8762399. Reviews bidirectional transplacental cell trafficking and fetal cells persisting in maternal tissues for decades.

Note: Microchimerism demonstrates that small populations of genetically distinct cells can persist within another person. It does not by itself establish any theological conclusion about the Assumption, resurrection, or personal identity.

Episode Summary

In “Catch and Release,” we explore evangelization as a process of invitation, accompaniment, release, and renewed encounter. Beginning with Jesus’ promise to make his disciples “fishers of men,” the episode asks what happens when Christian teachers and communities forget that their purpose is to point beyond themselves.

From the Samaritan woman, Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, John the Baptist, Paul and Apollos, and Jesus’ own approach to discipleship, Scripture repeatedly shows people being guided toward an encounter with God and then allowed to continue their journey. The episode also considers the danger of ministries becoming personality-driven Christian “fiefdoms” and concludes with Paul’s rebuke of the factions at Corinth: Christians are not baptized into Paul, Apollos, Peter, or any other human leader. They belong to Christ.

References

· Matthew 4:18–22 — Jesus calls the first disciples and promises to make them “fishers of men.”

· John 1:35–46 — John the Baptist points disciples toward Jesus; Andrew and Philip invite others to “come and see.”

· John 3:22–30 — John the Baptist: “He must increase; I must decrease.”

· John 4:4–42 — Jesus and the Samaritan woman; the Samaritans ultimately hear and believe for themselves.

· Mark 5:1–20 — Jesus sends the healed Gerasene man home rather than allowing him to remain with the traveling disciples.

· Mark 10:31, 42–45 — The first will be last; Christian greatness consists in service rather than domination.

· Acts 8:26–40 — Philip accompanies the Ethiopian eunuch, teaches and baptizes him, and the Ethiopian continues his journey.

· 1 Corinthians 1:10–17 — Paul condemns factions organized around Paul, Apollos and Cephas and reminds the Corinthians that Paul was neither crucified for them nor the one into whose name they were baptized.

· 1 Corinthians 3:4–9 — Paul planted, Apollos watered, but God caused the growth.

· 2 Corinthians 4:5–7 — Christians proclaim Jesus Christ rather than themselves and carry the treasure of the Gospel in “earthen vessels.”

· John 11:1–44 — Jesus’ love for Martha, Mary and Lazarus and the raising of Lazarus.

· Lois McMaster Bujold, The Curse of Chalion — brief thematic reference to divine service and the danger of placing the servant rather than the divine purpose at the center.

Share & Follow Into Deep Water

If this episode gave you something worth thinking about, you can help other people find Into Deep Water by sharing or reposting the episode from Substack to Facebook or Instagram.

Subscribe to get new episodes emailed to you directly when they are posted!

You can also follow Into Deep Water on Apple Podcasts and Spotify so new episodes appear automatically when they are published.

The complete archive of Into Deep Water - Beneath the Readings and Beyond the Readings is available at intodeepwater.substack.com.

Episode Summary

A devastating August 2026 crash in North Reading, Massachusetts, killed Andover father Samir Naili and his eight-year-old daughter Kashmira while they were stopped at a red light. The criminal case that followed raises difficult questions about intoxication, mental illness, diminished culpability, foreseeable danger, and responsibility.

In this episode of Into Deep Water – Beyond the Readings, we look beyond the particulars of the case to an ancient biblical principle: once we know that something poses a danger to another person, that knowledge creates responsibility.

From the dangerous ox of Exodus 21 and the rooftop parapet of Deuteronomy 22 to Paul’s teaching that Christian freedom must seek the good of our neighbor, Scripture challenges the modern assumption that personal freedom means freedom from responsibility. Catholic teaching on the common good and diminished culpability adds another layer: compassion for impaired agency does not eliminate society’s obligation to respond to foreseeable danger.

What do we owe one another? And when does an accident become negligence?

Scripture and Church References

· Genesis 4:9 — Cain’s question, “Am I my brother’s keeper?”· Exodus 21:28–29 — responsibility for an animal known to be dangerous· Deuteronomy 22:8 — the command to build a parapet to prevent foreseeable injury· Romans 14:7–12 — “None of us lives for oneself”· 1 Corinthians 10:23–24 — freedom and seeking the good of one’s neighbor· Galatians 5:13–14 — freedom exercised through loving service· Catechism of the Catholic Church, §§1735, 1905–1917 — diminished responsibility; the common good; responsibility and participation

Reporting References

· The Boston Globe — reporting on the North Reading crash, the victims, the defendant’s psychiatric history, and competency evaluation.· CBS Boston — reporting on the fatal crash and circumstances at the red light.· Boston.com — police-report-based coverage of alleged intoxication, open containers, earlier driving behavior, and the crash.· Boston 25 News — reporting on the charges and psychiatric evaluation.· WCVB — reporting on the victims and circumstances of the crash.

Note: Criminal charges remain allegations, and psychiatric competency proceedings were still underway when this episode was prepared.