Leibniz argues for God's creation as the best possible world, defining God's attributes (omniscience, omnipotence) and explaining the relationship between God, individual substances (monads), and the universe. He distinguishes between efficient and final causes, highlighting the role of God's will and understanding in governing events. Finally, he addresses the nature of human free will within this predetermined yet harmonious system.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's Monadology proposes that the universe consists of simple, indivisible substances called monads, each possessing perception and appetition. These monads, differing in quality, are distinct from one another and represent the entire universe from their unique perspective. Leibniz argues for the existence of God as the necessary substance that grounds the existence and harmony of all monads, establishing a pre-established harmony between the physical and moral realms. This harmony ensures that the actions of monads, governed by final causes, align perfectly with the laws of efficient causes in the physical world. Ultimately, Leibniz's system envisions a divinely ordered universe where all things, both physical and moral, work together in a perfect and preordained system.

The first rationalist we will cover is Rene Descartes. Descartes details his methodical approach to doubting established beliefs, aiming to construct a firm foundation for truth. The excerpt covers his skepticism, his four maxims for reasoning, and his proofs for the existence of God and the human soul. Further, it summarizes his physics, focusing on the motion of the heart and the distinction between humans and animals. Finally, it discusses the reasons behind his decision to publish his work, expressing both confidence in his methods and reluctance to engage in fruitless controversies.

The Meditations introduces Descartes's innovative method of achieving certain knowledge by systematically doubting all previously held beliefs, ultimately establishing the Cogito ("I think, therefore I am") as a foundational truth.

The third of the "British Empiricists" is John Locke, also known for his political philosophy and his Treatises on Government (check out our episode on the second treatise). Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, presented here in excerpts, explores the origins and nature of human knowledge. Locke argues against the existence of innate ideas, proposing instead that all knowledge stems from sensory experience (sensation) and reflection on mental processes. He details various types of ideas, including simple and complex ideas, modes, substances, and relations, analyzing their formation and potential for error. The text also discusses the nature of personal identity, free will, and morality, ultimately aiming to establish a framework for understanding the limits and capabilities of human understanding.

The second of the "British Empiricists" that will be covered is George Berkeley. George Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge argues against the existence of matter, asserting that all things exist only in the mind of God. He refutes the concept of abstract ideas, showing how they are based on language rather than genuine mental constructs. Berkeley contends that sensations are not copies of external objects but are directly perceived and, therefore, reality is fundamentally perceptual.

Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is much shorter than the Treatise but is known to be more precise and clear. Hume argues for an empiricist and instrumentalist approach to knowledge. He emphasized the role of experience and custom over reason in forming beliefs, notably concerning causation and miracles.

Kick off the new season Rationalism vs. Empiricism with the empiricist David Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature explores the nature of human understanding and the passions. Sections cover topics like inference, belief, probability, causality, and the will. The text further investigates the nature of identity, reason in animals, and the origins of morality, ultimately proposing a system based on experience, custom, and the imagination.

Plato's Republic explores the nature of justice. Socrates, through dialogues with various interlocutors, investigates different definitions of justice, ultimately arguing that a just life is superior to an unjust one, both in terms of individual well-being and societal harmony. The discussion extends to ideal forms of government, education, and the soul's composition, utilizing metaphors like the allegory of the cave to illustrate philosophical concepts. Key themes include the importance of reason, the pursuit of knowledge, and the ideal state's structure, with significant attention paid to the role of philosophy and the limitations of art and poetry. The text also examines the cyclical nature of political systems and the corresponding characteristics of individuals within those systems.

Plato's Meno primarily explores the question of whether virtue can be taught. Socrates and Meno engage in a discussion that examines various definitions of virtue, ultimately concluding that it is neither innate nor learned but rather a divinely bestowed gift. The text also introduces Plato's theory of reminiscence, suggesting that learning is a process of recollecting pre-existing knowledge from a past life. Finally, a substantial section analyzes Plato's theory of Forms, comparing it to the philosophical approaches of later thinkers.