In this episode, Rhod looks at whether philanthropic giving is always a choice on the part of the donor, or whether it can sometimes be compelled. Topics covered include:

-Compelled by your peers: We look at the part peer pressure plays in philanthropy, both at a micro level (i.e. the effect that "being watched" has on prompting giving) and a macro level (i.e. the notion of a social contract). We also consider a bit of history (including a scathing attack on the culture of giving in Victorian England).

-Compelled by a higher authority: We consider the role governments have played a role in shaping philanthropy through charity law: from the 1601 Statute of Charitable Uses to the emergence of "GONGOs" in modern China. We look at the idea of "percentage philanthropy", and whether it should be seen as philanthropy at all, or merely a form of tax. We also touch on obligations to give in various major religions and what role these play in driving philanthropy.

-Compelled by your own mind: We explore unusual cases of "pathological generosity", where people with brain damage find themselves compelled to give to such a degree that it can adversely affect them and their families.

Related Material

• Public Good by Private Means: How Philanthropy Shapes Britain

• Eye Images Increase Charitable Donations: Evidence From an Opportunistic Field Experiment in a Supermarket

• So are the conditions for philanthropy improving in China or not? CAF Future World Giving blog

• Explaining Percentage Philanthropy, International Centre for Nonprofit Law

• Could zakat plug the gaps in humanitarian or development aid?

• The Man Who Couldn't Stop Giving, The Atlantic