
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today, Joseph critiques the most common Christian defenses of biblical slavery and explains why they fail. An atheist perspective then offers a more philosophically sophisticated—though still deeply flawed—defense that Christian apologists should be using if they want to be taken seriously. Drawing on the “Block Universe” view of time, the argument suggests that God’s commands may have been temporary moral accommodations suited to ancient cultures, intended to lead future generations to recognize slavery as immoral.
By Atheist Joseph VinaToday, Joseph critiques the most common Christian defenses of biblical slavery and explains why they fail. An atheist perspective then offers a more philosophically sophisticated—though still deeply flawed—defense that Christian apologists should be using if they want to be taken seriously. Drawing on the “Block Universe” view of time, the argument suggests that God’s commands may have been temporary moral accommodations suited to ancient cultures, intended to lead future generations to recognize slavery as immoral.