
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Brian Holdsworth says Catholicism is the “safer bet”—but what if the very wager he uses turns against him? In this response, I expose the deep flaws in his Pascal’s Wager argument, his shallow caricature of Protestant beliefs, and the dangerous assumption that Rome’s gospel is just a “fuller” version of the truth. Spoiler: it’s not. If trusting in Christ alone is enough, then adding saints, icons, and Marian dogmas isn’t safer—it’s spiritual risk. This video is not just a rebuttal. It’s a challenge to think clearly, honestly, and biblically. Because the real danger isn’t rejecting Catholicism—it’s believing it offers salvation when it doesn’t.
By Jayni Jackson5
22 ratings
Brian Holdsworth says Catholicism is the “safer bet”—but what if the very wager he uses turns against him? In this response, I expose the deep flaws in his Pascal’s Wager argument, his shallow caricature of Protestant beliefs, and the dangerous assumption that Rome’s gospel is just a “fuller” version of the truth. Spoiler: it’s not. If trusting in Christ alone is enough, then adding saints, icons, and Marian dogmas isn’t safer—it’s spiritual risk. This video is not just a rebuttal. It’s a challenge to think clearly, honestly, and biblically. Because the real danger isn’t rejecting Catholicism—it’s believing it offers salvation when it doesn’t.