ITC#7: Tim Marsh on DPP v Walters 
 
Politicians regularly seek to constrain the discretion of sentencing judges. Victoria's baseline sentencing regime was a strange, unique, and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to do so. Tim Marsh talks about the decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal in DPP v Walters, which grappled with this unusual legislative scheme.

ITC#7: Tim Marsh on DPP v Walters Politicians regularly seek to constrain the discretion of sentencing judges. Victoria's baseline sentencing regime was a strange, unique, and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to do so. Tim Marsh talks about the decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal in DPP v Walters, which grappled with this unusual legislative scheme.

ITC#7: Tim Marsh on DPP v Walters 
 
Politicians regularly seek to constrain the discretion of sentencing judges. Victoria's baseline sentencing regime was a strange, unique, and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to do so. Tim Marsh talks about the decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal in DPP v Walters, which grappled with this unusual legislative scheme.

ITC#7

A podcast about public interest cases which have shaped Australia

Share ITC#7

Sign up to save your podcasts

ITC#7

ITC#7