Political analyst and messaging strategist Rachel Bitecofer joins hosts Max Marty and Josh Eakle for a provocative discussion about why Democrats keep losing the messaging war—and what it will take to fight back against authoritarian threats. Rachel is the Author of "Hit Them Where It Hurts," arguing that Democrats' preference for positive campaigning and policy wonkery is a luxury the country can no longer afford.

The conversation explores the psychology of voter behavior, the asymmetry in campaign tactics between parties, and whether Democrats must embrace fear-based messaging to save democracy itself. Max pushes back on the "race to the bottom" concern while Bitecofer insists the house is already on fire—and worrying about furniture arrangements can wait.

Topics Discussed:

* Why party identification explains 90% of vote choice—and how Rachel believes Republicans weaponize this through negative branding

* Loss aversion psychology: Why fear motivates voters more than hope or policy promises

* The 2024 postmortem: How $1 billion in positive Democratic ads failed while Trump's "she's for they/them" attacks succeeded

* Is appealing to voter's virtue a trap

* Historical parallels to 1930s Europe and why humans are psychologically wired to deny threats until it's too late

Links & Resources:

* Rachel Bitecofer's on Substack "The Cycle" –https://substack.com/@thecycle?

* "Hit Them Where It Hurts" by Rachel Bitecofer – https://a.co/d/0ri9Pni

* Project Liberal – https://www.projectliberal.org

* Become a Project Liberal member and help us make more content like this – https://projectliberal.org/member

Get full access to Project Liberal at projectliberal.substack.com/subscribe