Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Izzy's 'Fine' With Modules
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Izzy's 'Fine' With Modules
This week we chat with Isabella (Izzy) Muerte about modules, build systems and more.
We talk about xyr new job (which, at the time of recording, was with Netlify),
and how that still involves working on build systems - but particularly CMake,
where xe has found an intriguing special use for emoji!
We segue into a discussion about modules, which Izzy was definitely down on a couple of years ago,
and what xe thinks of them now. To avoid spoilers don’t read the title!
Links:
- Izzy's (2017) rant on Modules
- 'tag_invoke' - An Actually Good Way to Do Customization Points- Gašper Ažman's talk at C++ London
- byteswap- P1272 - Byteswapping for fun&&nuf
- retain_ptr- P0468 - An Intrusive Smart Pointer
- Lambda Expressions on cppreference- constexpr: explicitly specifies that the function call operator is a constexpr function. When this specifier is not present, the function call operator will be constexpr anyway, if it happens to satisfy all constexpr function requirements (since C++17)
View all episodes
By Jon Kalb & Phil Nash
3.9
1818 ratings
This week we chat with Isabella (Izzy) Muerte about modules, build systems and more.
We talk about xyr new job (which, at the time of recording, was with Netlify),
and how that still involves working on build systems - but particularly CMake,
where xe has found an intriguing special use for emoji!
We segue into a discussion about modules, which Izzy was definitely down on a couple of years ago,
and what xe thinks of them now. To avoid spoilers don’t read the title!
Links:
- Izzy's (2017) rant on Modules
- 'tag_invoke' - An Actually Good Way to Do Customization Points- Gašper Ažman's talk at C++ London
- byteswap- P1272 - Byteswapping for fun&&nuf
- retain_ptr- P0468 - An Intrusive Smart Pointer
- Lambda Expressions on cppreference- constexpr: explicitly specifies that the function call operator is a constexpr function. When this specifier is not present, the function call operator will be constexpr anyway, if it happens to satisfy all constexpr function requirements (since C++17)