
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The Court underscored Article 20(1) of the Constitution, holding that an accused cannot be convicted under a penal provision absent on the statute book when the alleged act occurred.
The conviction under Section 195-A IPC was set aside, reflecting the constitutional safeguard against retrospective criminal laws, but the sentence under Section 506-B IPC was rigorously maintained due to robust evidence.
Statutes Involved:
1. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Section 305, Section 506-B, Section 195-A
2. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC): Section 374(2), Section 394
3. Constitution of India: Article 20, Clause (1)
The Court underscored Article 20(1) of the Constitution, holding that an accused cannot be convicted under a penal provision absent on the statute book when the alleged act occurred.
The conviction under Section 195-A IPC was set aside, reflecting the constitutional safeguard against retrospective criminal laws, but the sentence under Section 506-B IPC was rigorously maintained due to robust evidence.
Statutes Involved:
1. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Section 305, Section 506-B, Section 195-A
2. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC): Section 374(2), Section 394
3. Constitution of India: Article 20, Clause (1)