In this episode of the Journal of Gynecologic Oncology podcast, we discuss the findings from a recent study titled "Cost-effectiveness analysis of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: analysis from the GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE trial." The study evaluates the financial and clinical outcomes of simple versus radical hysterectomy for low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. The results show that simple hysterectomy is both more cost-effective and results in better long-term quality of life compared to radical hysterectomy, with fewer postoperative complications. Tune in to hear how these findings could influence future treatment guidelines and improve patient care.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: analysis from the GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE trial (https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e117)