This episode covers key developments in three major restructuring and bankruptcy cases:

In the long-running A&P bankruptcy, a New York court issues a series of rulings that reduce a $68 million preference recovery effort to just $3.3 million, drawing a sharp line between routine commercial payments protected by Bankruptcy Code defenses and transfers tainted by creditor pressure, altered payment methods, or stay violations.

A Delaware bankruptcy court enforces a Section 363 sale order in the iSun case, rejecting an attempt to invalidate a solar asset sale based on a missing signature page and reaffirming that sale orders and purchase agreements must be interpreted as a unified transaction rather than through isolated drafting errors.

And Freedom Forever, one of the nation’s largest residential solar installers, seeks approval for an accelerated “Project Sunshine” sale process, racing against tax credit deadlines, debt maturities, and the potential erosion of its dealer network as it markets the business without a stalking horse bidder.

💡 From preference litigation and contract interpretation to distressed renewable energy transactions, this episode examines how courts are balancing procedural rigor, asset value preservation, and creditor recoveries in some of today’s most closely watched Chapter 11 cases.

Thank you for listening! Visit researchsuite.stretto.com for more information.

Follow us on LinkedIn.