
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The US Supreme Court heard marathon arguments over the role state courts play in setting federal election rules.
University of Iowa law professor Derek Muller says there was little appetite on the court during arguments Dec. 7 to cut state courts wholly out of the process.
Muller joins Cases and Controversies hosts to discuss Moore v. Harper, the independent state legislature theory it implicates, and the concerns voiced by the justices.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
3.9
153153 ratings
The US Supreme Court heard marathon arguments over the role state courts play in setting federal election rules.
University of Iowa law professor Derek Muller says there was little appetite on the court during arguments Dec. 7 to cut state courts wholly out of the process.
Muller joins Cases and Controversies hosts to discuss Moore v. Harper, the independent state legislature theory it implicates, and the concerns voiced by the justices.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
9,163 Listeners
1,108 Listeners
361 Listeners
6,293 Listeners
3,521 Listeners
463 Listeners
502 Listeners
666 Listeners
25,875 Listeners
31 Listeners
3,537 Listeners
110 Listeners
172 Listeners
5,687 Listeners
3,784 Listeners
379 Listeners
666 Listeners