
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The US Supreme Court heard marathon arguments over the role state courts play in setting federal election rules.
University of Iowa law professor Derek Muller says there was little appetite on the court during arguments Dec. 7 to cut state courts wholly out of the process.
Muller joins Cases and Controversies hosts to discuss Moore v. Harper, the independent state legislature theory it implicates, and the concerns voiced by the justices.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
3.9
149149 ratings
The US Supreme Court heard marathon arguments over the role state courts play in setting federal election rules.
University of Iowa law professor Derek Muller says there was little appetite on the court during arguments Dec. 7 to cut state courts wholly out of the process.
Muller joins Cases and Controversies hosts to discuss Moore v. Harper, the independent state legislature theory it implicates, and the concerns voiced by the justices.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
1,098 Listeners
360 Listeners
6,281 Listeners
3,470 Listeners
456 Listeners
498 Listeners
681 Listeners
31 Listeners
111,169 Listeners
56,009 Listeners
109 Listeners
170 Listeners
5,509 Listeners
3,352 Listeners
365 Listeners
664 Listeners