Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 416.

Part 2 of my video commentary on Larken Rose's recent comments on IP. For more information, see the description and links at KOL415: Commentary on Larken Rose, “IP: The Wrong Question”: Part 1.

https://youtu.be/3W7ZSkzjOtQ

KOL416: Commentary on Larken Rose, “IP: The Wrong Question”: Part 2

Austro-Anarchist Libertarian Legal Theory

Society & Culture

Personal Journals

History

Philosophy

Places & Travel

Education

Training

Language Courses

Higher Education

K-12

Educational Technology

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 429.

A facebook friend from Brazil, Bruno Pires, corresponded with me about some various issues and we decided to discuss it for a podcast episode. We discuss a variety of issues.

See his promoted VPN sponsor Aria VPN.

https://youtu.be/a8YdkT2_Tec

KOL429 | Argumentation Ethics, Milei, Bitcoin with Bruno Pires of Brazil

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 428.

I was a guest on Episode 316 of The Bob Murphy Show, entitled “Stephan Kinsella on Rothbard’s Contributions to Legal Theory." Bob's shownotes: "Stephan joins Bob to discuss his new book, Legal Foundations of a Free Society. They cover Rothbard’s contributions to legal theory, as well as Bob and Stephan’s differing entry points into libertarianism."

https://youtu.be/iWx8DKMwk30?si=54KjWm_BndPX4a_e

KOL428 | Bob Murphy Show ep. 316: Rothbard’s Contributions to Legal Theory

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 427.



Yesterday (April 10, 2024) I participated in Strings Attached: Tracing the Global Systems that Bind, 62nd Annual International Affairs Symposium, Lewis & Clark College, Portland Oregon, Debate 5: Pirates and Patents. Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?

My opponent was Pieter Cleppe. My notes are appended below.

https://youtu.be/f_cpqc-oHd0

We got along well and had a nice dinner after the debate.

(Unofficial iphone Audio (mp3))

 



Strings Attached: Tracing the Global Systems that Bind.

62nd Annual International Affairs Symposium

Debate 5: Pirates and Patents. 

Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?

Lewis & Clark College, Portland Oregon

April 10, 2024

Stephan Kinsella

 

Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?

 	“Patents, copyrights, trademarks, etc, are intangible legal protections that allow creators to monopolize the distribution of their ideas. The international system managing these rights is often praised for promoting and protecting innovation. However, it raises the costs of acquiring new technologies, life-saving medicines, and access to knowledge for developing states. How should international intellectual property standards balance these competing interests?”

 

Introduction

 	I am a practicing patent and intellectual property, or IP, attorney for 30 years and a libertarian for even longer than that.
 	At the dawn of my career, after many years of research and thought, I came to the conclusion that all forms of IP law are completely unjust.
 	This perspective will inform my remarks today.

 

 	Notice my opponent’s remarks were not systematic and did not carefully define the relevant terms.

 	In fact his arguments rested on two false assumptions: that patent and copyright increase innovation, and that IP law is therefore justified.



 

Imperialism and IP

 	What is imperialism? Imperialism: “a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force.”

 	“Imperialism is when a country extends its power into other territories for economic or political gain.”


 	Now, IP law is prevalent in the west: patent, copyright, trademark, and other forms.
 	There can be little doubt that the west, especially the United States, has used its influence and power to push or even coerce other countries to adopt US-style IP law, primarily patent and copyright

 	This is done sometimes by direct imposition or, more usually, by softer forms of coercion such as investment and free trade agreements or other international treaties
 	Direct imposition/coercion:

 	for example the US expanded Iraqi patent law by decree in 2004, by order of Paul Bremer, the “Administrator” of the “Coalition Provisional Authority”
 	German constitution, or “Basic Law,” 1949, under US domination: Article 96 authorizes the establishment by federal law of the Federal Patent Court
 	Example below: under pressures from the west, the Thai government specifically undertook not to implement Article 8 (on compulsory licensing) for HIV/AIDS treatment


 	Treaties: The Berne Convention already requires member states to have a minimum copyright term of life of the author plus 50 y...

KOL427 | Lewis & Clark College Debate on Intellectual Property Imperialism

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 426.

Matthew Sands of the Nations of Sanity project, which aims to promote the Non-Aggression Principle as a universal peace agreement, and I discussed various issues including: immigration and open borders, and so on.

(See previous episode with Matthew, KOL372 | Discussing Contract Theory, Restitution, Punishment, with Matthew Sands of Nations of Sanity and KOL362 | California Gold #6, with Matt Sands: Defining Libertarianism, Anarchism and Voluntaryism.)

https://youtu.be/zXKxc8QxqKo

Related links:

 	Switzerland, Immigration, Hoppe, Raico, Callahan
 	A Simple Libertarian Argument Against Unrestricted Immigration and Open Borders, LewRockwell.com, September 1, 2005
 	Van Dun on Freedom versus Property and Hostile Encirclement
 	Libertarian Answer Man: Homesteading Donuts, Hostile Encirclement, and Prostitution as Selling One’s Body

KOL416: Commentary on Larken Rose, “IP: The Wrong Question”: Part 2

Download our free app to listen on your phone