KURM 790 AM On Demand

Catch all the action of Gravette high school football on KURM 790 AM! Relive the excitement as the Rogers Mounties and Rogers Heritage War Eagles take the field, with play-by-play coverage of the biggest plays, touchdowns, and memorable moments.

KURM 790 AM — NWA's Radio Station.

Listen live and catch up on past games at KURM790.com or on the 479 Media App for iPhone and Android.

Catch all the action of Gravette high school football on KURM 790 AM! Relive the excitement as the Rogers Mounties and Rogers Heritage War Eagles take the field, with play-by-play coverage of the biggest plays, touchdowns, and memorable moments.

KURM 790 AM — NWA's Radio Station.

Listen live and catch up on past games at KURM790.com or on the 479 Media App for iPhone and Android.

A candidate forum in Gravette centered on managing rapid growth, infrastructure needs, and school funding. Mayor Kurt Maddox and challenger Matt Croxell laid out plans for sidewalks, sewer upgrades, traffic fixes and the proposed stoplight at 59 and 72; he emphasized grants and long-term engineering while Croxell warned about traffic spillover into Old Town. School board candidates Melanie Nichols and Tracy Moorman focused on enrollment unpredictability, district finances, and a potential land sale; she stressed long-term planning and community ties while he defended negotiating options. The group also debated school choice and voucher policy, with concerns raised about accountability for private and homeschooled students. The forum featured audience questions, was hosted by the Kiwanis, and recorded by 479 Media, offering a clear view of local priorities ahead of the election. Gravette voters heard a focused, practical debate about the town’s future when two mayoral contenders and several school board hopefuls took the Kiwanis stage. He, the incumbent mayor, walked through a record of grant-driven projects — millions secured for sidewalks, a reworked Main Street, park renovations, and sewer improvements — and framed growth as both an opportunity and a responsibility. He stressed planning, working with engineers on three- to ten-year infrastructure roadmaps, and keeping the city safe through sustained training for police and fire. He asked the community to weigh controlled growth so services can be funded without overextending the budget. She, the challenger, emphasized integrity, safety, and the need to guide developers into contributing to traffic and street improvements rather than expecting the city to shoulder all costs. He warned that some solutions, like a new stoplight at the 59/72 intersection, could worsen congestion unless paired with broader traffic planning. Both candidates agreed on elements of long-range planning but differed on tactics: one defended committed projects and funding streams already in place, while the other urged deeper coordination with state agencies and developers to avoid the stop-start problems other nearby towns have faced. The forum left a clear theme: growth is coming, and Gravette must balance ambition with practical, funded plans to keep the town functioning and safe.

Takeaways:

• They emphasized planned infrastructure and managed growth, noting grant funding and long term sewer and water projects.
• He warned that a stoplight at the 59 and 72 intersection could worsen traffic and urged further state discussion.
• They described unpredictable enrollment and shifting state funding as primary challenges for district budgeting and long range planning.
• They expressed concern about school choice vouchers, arguing private and homeschool accountability and resources are uneven compared to public schools.
• They highlighted community values, stressing support for families, school pride, and opposition to an entertainment district on Main Street.
• They cited their local roots, professional experience, and public service as reasons voters should consider them this election.
• They noted the forum format allowed direct public questions and committed to listening, transparency, and following legal requirements in decisions.

She is running for the U.S. Senate to unseat Tom Cotton and says federal policy failures forced her family to close a 150-year-old Arkansas farm. On KURM 790 AM, she discusses the farm crisis, rising costs, and the need for an updated farm bill. She frames agriculture, rural healthcare, infrastructure, and wages as connected priorities and argues federal action should support small farms, expand Medicaid, and invest in roads and electrical grids. She criticizes Cotton’s votes on farm legislation and military action in Iran as out of step with Arkansas needs and as factors driving higher fuel and commodity prices. Asked about cultural concerns and her past donations, she emphasizes pragmatism, compromise, and making policy decisions that make life safer, more affordable, and better for people in Arkansas. She closes by asking voters to choose her as a senator who will “do the work” for the state.

Takeaways:

• She stresses practical solutions and local focus rather than national partisan ideological posturing.
• She is a sixth-generation Arkansas farmer who closed her family's 150-year farm and is running to unseat Tom Cotton.
• She blames a prolonged farm crisis, an outdated farm bill, and lost export markets for widespread farm financial distress.
• She proposes shifting policy to grow food for local consumption, support specialty crops, and update federal farm programs to lower costs.
• She argues ending the Iran conflict and taking pragmatic federal actions would help reduce fuel prices and ease household expenses.
• She emphasizes rural healthcare and infrastructure investment, Medicaid expansion, and higher reimbursement rates to preserve hospitals and rebuild local economies.

The Lowell Candidate Forum presents an opportunity for voters to engage with candidates vying for leadership positions in the upcoming mayoral and city council elections. This unscripted discussion, facilitated by Mark Wells of 479 Media alongside News Director Dave Shoen, emphasizes transparency and civic responsibility. The forum encompasses a comprehensive examination of candidate backgrounds, their visions for Lowell, and critical issues such as municipal budget management, public safety, and local economic development. As candidates articulate their positions, they address pressing concerns regarding infrastructure and housing affordability, reflecting the community's needs and aspirations. This forum serves as a vital platform for fostering informed electoral choices among the citizens of Lowell.

Takeaways:

• The Lowell Candidate Forum provides a platform for candidates to discuss their backgrounds and visions for the future of Lowell, Arkansas.
• Each candidate emphasizes the importance of transparency and community engagement in local governance and decision-making processes.
• Public safety and police accountability are critical topics, with candidates advocating for better hiring practices and training for law enforcement personnel.
• Infrastructure needs, such as addressing potholes, drainage issues, and ensuring effective municipal services, are highlighted as urgent priorities for the city.
• Candidates express the necessity of attracting economic development through streamlined processes and reduced bureaucratic obstacles for new businesses.
• The forum underscores the candidates' commitment to listening to constituents and addressing their concerns regarding local leadership and city management.