Iran-Israel conflict reveals spy tactics, global tensions, and shifting alliances.

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. What is your assessment of the recent conflict between Iran and Israel?
2. How do you interpret the role of Western intelligence in targeting Iranian scientists?
3. What are the implications of the U.S. unilaterally canceling talks with Russia?
4. Do you believe the IAEA remains a credible organization for nuclear oversight?
5. How do you see the involvement of global powers like Russia and China shaping the current crisis?

Larry C. Johnson:

1. The recent conflict exposes vulnerabilities in Iran’s counterintelligence, but also highlights the aggressive tactics used by Israel and its allies.
2. Western intelligence collaboration with groups like the MEK has been pivotal in targeting key figures, undermining Iran's security.
3. The cancellation of U.S.-Russia talks reflects Washington’s erratic foreign policy, likely escalating tensions rather than de-escalating them.
4. The IAEA has lost credibility due to its alignment with Western interests, especially after being used to facilitate attacks on Iranian scientists.
5. Russia and China are likely to support Iran indirectly, but direct involvement would risk broader global conflict, which they aim to avoid.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.