Cases and Controversies

Law Enforcement Accountability Elusive at High Court


Listen Later

The Supreme Court again chipped away at the ability of those alleging constitutional violations by federal law enforcement to sue, effectively immunizing Border Patrol agents from being hauled into court.

Athul Acharya, of the public interest law firm Public Accountability, says the June 8 ruling in Egbert v. Boule is one of several judge-made barriers to suing government officials.

There are many stages “in the gauntlet that civil rights plaintiffs have to run before they can have their claim heard on the merits,” Acharya said, noting there are jurisdictional and other technical barriers, questions about who can be sued, and then immunity doctrines.

The latest ruling limiting so-called Bivens claims, isn’t a surprise. The fortified conservative-majority court has questioned the authority of judges to permit suits against federal officials in instances where Congress hasn’t.

In “all but the most unusual circumstances, prescribing a cause of action is a job for Congress, not the courts,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the 6-3 Boule ruling that split the court along ideological lines.

Acharya explains that another barrier to suits against law enforcement—qualified immunity—is subject to the same criticism.

The doctrine, which often shields officers from being sued for all but the most obvious constitutional violations, has come under fire recently by groups on the right and the left.

But qualified immunity is still considered by courts to be “good law,” despite being a judge-made rule.

It’s an open question “why atextual doctrines like qualified immunity are OK” with the justices, while Bivens claims aren’t, Acharya said.

Cases dealing with qualified immunity are constantly pending before the justices. Cope v. Cogdill, alleging that jail officials failed to prevent a detainee’s suicide, has been considered at their private conferences 10 times. But the justices haven’t seemed eager to address the doctrine in that case or any other.


Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Cases and ControversiesBy Bloomberg Law

  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9

3.9

149 ratings


More shows like Cases and Controversies

View all
We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,090 Listeners

Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

Bloomberg Law

363 Listeners

The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

The Lawfare Podcast

6,273 Listeners

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

3,461 Listeners

Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer by Legal Talk Network

Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

443 Listeners

The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond by Alison Monahan and Lee Burgess - Law School Toolbox, LLC

The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond

498 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

672 Listeners

On The Merits by Bloomberg Industry Group

On The Merits

32 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

111,512 Listeners

Up First from NPR by NPR

Up First from NPR

56,071 Listeners

Talking Tax by Bloomberg Tax

Talking Tax

111 Listeners

UnCommon Law by Bloomberg Industry Group

UnCommon Law

170 Listeners

Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

Strict Scrutiny

5,479 Listeners

5-4 by Prologue Projects

5-4

3,360 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

366 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

666 Listeners