A Thought Experiment: Designing New Countries

Let’s - for fun - imagine building a brand-new country from scratch. Or maybe not just one, but a handful of different ones, each exploring a different philosophy of how humans could live together.

What would they look like? How would they behave? What values would they be built on? If we were free of the rampant corruption, historical baggage, and accidental compromises of centralized power that shaped today’s nations, how could we do better?

Start With Two Simple Lists

Keep - what’s genuinely working:Individual rights, collaboration, creativity, innovation, safety nets, a code or constitution, and the preservation of cultural richness and diversity.

Fix or prevent - what’s broken or dangerous:Entrenched corruption, lack of transparency, centralized power (how can we decentralize it?), bureaucratic bloat, poor health outcomes, centralized science and academia, wealth gaps, unhealthy media ecosystems, failing infrastructure, central banks, or anything else that consistently produces bad outcomes for citizens.

Ask Bigger Structural Questions

GovernanceHow can we decentralize power structures? What methods work better than voting for a single person - since individual leaders are too easy to corrupt? Should there be large merit-based councils, citizen assemblies, or something new, like collective swarm intelligence systems? How do we keep power distributed enough to avoid authoritarian drift but coherent enough to make decisions?

EconomicsWould we lean into free markets but with guardrails? Build cooperative, citizen-owned companies (or “customer owned” models)? Experiment with new ideas such as universal basic income or resource dividends? Eliminate entrenched centralized power structures such as Wall Street? Eliminate central banks? Experiment with new forms of decentralized money?

Justice & SafetyHow could laws and enforcement protect people without feeding cycles of incarceration, violence, or oppression? Could technology help with accountability without creating surveillance states? Could education and opportunity coach people away from crime? Could a new understanding of collaboration persuade even greedy people to work with others?

Culture & IdentityWould national identity come from shared values, shared history, or shared projects? Could multiple “micro-cultures” thrive while still staying connected?

Feedback LoopsHow would people signal dissatisfaction or propose changes in a way that’s fast, fair, and not hijacked by special interests or “The Corruptors”?

Test and Iterate

Imagine if we had multiple testbeds - small “model countries” with different blends of governance and culture - and could watch which thrive and which fail. Some might emphasize radical local democracy. Others might test long-term stewardship - leadership measured not by quarterly approval but by 50-year well-being metrics. Some could build economies around environmental restoration, some around rapid innovation, some around social trust.

The idea for these already exists and is known as Network States. The term gets pushback because the most visible examples are dystopian: China’s social credit system or the digital ID and CBDC models that “The Corruptors” promote through platforms like the WEF. We agree - those are horrible. But the original idea is more like a pirate country: a digital simulation of a nation you can design however you want. Build it. Test it. If it works, you can start uploading it into real governance frameworks.

Why This Matters

We still have an opportunity to think this way. The way out of these broken and corrupted systems is not to fight them forever, but rather to invent new ones -build the frameworks for them - and then migrate toward them. Once we feel confident, we then start to implement them into governments, like uploading a new software or operating system for humanity - town by town, county by county, state by state, and country by country.But first it starts with collective creativity.

If you could build new countries with what we know now, what tradeoffs would you choose? What would you copy from successful places? What would you toss out? And how would you protect the experiment itself from turning into the same old game of power and control?

Thanks for reading!Please subscribe for free!

All problems that do not defy the laws of physics are solvable with the right knowledge - David DeutschHumans solve problems better in high-trust groups, and solving problems is happiness!

#CollectiveIntelligenceFor over 3 billion years on this planet there were only single-celled organisms. Then one day they somehow learned to work together and make complex multi-celled creatures . Right now we are like those single-celled organisms. Our next evolution is finding how to work together, better… (like we wrote about here).#SwarmAcademy #NetworkState #LEADERLESS #ResultsMatterMost #DecentralizeEverything #DemandTransparencyCOMMENTS ARE FOR EVERYONE AS A PLACE TO THINK-TANK SOLUTIONS. They will never be for paid-only subscribers and we will never charge a subscription.This is how we change the world. We build genies - systems of people like this:

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit joshketry.substack.com