Episode 2 traces how the past lives inside the present-day VA. The conversation walks through slavery, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, GI Bill exclusions, redlining, and infamous medical abuses like Tuskegee to show how racism has been baked into U.S. systems for generations. Listeners get a clear, accessible definition of structural racism and how it shapes where people live, the care they receive, and how they’re treated in institutions, including the military and VA. By the end of the episode, mistrust of systems is reframed as rational and historically grounded, not a personal flaw, and the show begins to connect these histories to overlapping identities that will be taken up more fully in later episodes.

This opening episode sets the stage: what exactly isn’t working for Black veterans in the VA health and benefits system, and how do we know it’s not “just in someone’s head”? The host grounds the conversation in their positionality (whiteness, veteran status, and professional role) and names the commitment to center Black veterans’ lived expertise alongside research and policy reports. Listeners are walked through the “pipeline” of inequity—from accessing care, to exams and documentation, to decisions and outcomes—using data to show clear patterns of structural racism. Critical Race Theory is introduced as the guiding framework for the season, and the Black Veteran Advisory Panel is highlighted as a core partner in deciding what questions get asked and what “better” should look like.

Bringing together the entire season, Episode 9 offers a systems-level blueprint for “building the fix” rather than simply naming what’s broken. Co-design is framed as the default, not a special project. Black veterans shift from being subjects of research or policy to co-authors of how care, claims, and data stewardship are structured. The episode walks through what this looks like in practice: co-designed exam scripts and checklists, veteran advisory councils with real decision power, equity dashboards co-governed with communities, and clear accountability loops when inequities show up. Listeners get a three-level playbook for veterans, clinicians, and leaders, rooted in the idea that trust is not begged for, it is designed, measured, and earned over time.

Episode 8 asks a deceptively simple question: who controls the data that define Black veterans’ realities, and who gets locked out? The discussion unpacks how restricted access to VA data makes it hard (or impossible) for independent researchers, Black scholars, and community partners to replicate findings or challenge blind spots, and how incomplete race and ethnicity data can hide real disparities. Listeners learn how underrepresentation in research participation, mistrust, and technical gaps come together to create “partial visibility” for Black veterans. The episode then explores what equitable data practices could look like, from shared governance and open science norms to tiered data access and partnership with HBCUs/MSIs. The central message: data equity is not a technical side issue; it’s core to justice, accountability, and trust.

Here, the focus shifts to who works inside the VA and what it feels like to receive care there. The episode looks at gaps in representation across the VA workforce and leadership, and why having more Black clinicians and leaders isn’t symbolic, t’s an equity intervention tied to survival and trust. Listeners hear how organizational climate (respect, belonging, safety) shows up directly in patient experiences: whether people stay in care, follow up on treatment, or feel safe naming discrimination. The episode also examines national rollbacks of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) structures and what happens when equity offices, dashboards, and training programs are weakened or removed. Throughout, it offers concrete, non-performative ways veterans, clinicians, and leaders can protect equity work by embedding it into quality, safety, and governance rather than treating it as an add-on.

Episode 6 makes the case that you cannot fix inequity for Black veterans if you only look at one identity at a time. Building on intersectionality, the episode shows how race, gender, class, disability, sexual orientation, and other identities overlap to produce compounded risk, especially for those who already face higher denial rates, poorer outcomes, or greater exposure to trauma. Listeners are introduced to concepts like “weathering” and allostatic load to describe the physical toll of living with chronic, intersectional stress. Then the conversation turns practical: how data, dashboards, training, and governance have to change so the VA can actually “see” the veterans who are most at risk instead of flattening them into averages. This episode acts as a hinge, connecting earlier conversations about pain and claims to upcoming ones about climate, representation, and data.

Focusing directly on Black women veterans, this episode looks at what happens when racism and sexism collide in VA and community care. It explores key risks—like military sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and maternal health inequities—and shows how policy instability around reproductive health can further erode trust. The episode offers a clear picture of what high-quality, trauma-informed, survivor-centered care should look like: real options, informed consent as a living practice (not just a signature), and freedom from coercion. Listeners hear how trust (or its absence) affects engagement, retention, and health-related quality of life, and they walk away with concrete examples of what Black women veterans, clinicians, and leaders can each do to make care safer and more dignified.

Episode 4 moves from clinic rooms to claims offices and rating decisions. It unpacks evidence that Black veterans are less likely to be granted VA disability benefits for the same diagnoses as White veterans, including PTSD and military sexual trauma–related PTSD. Listeners are guided through how inequity can creep in at every step: documentation, Compensation & Pension (C&P) exams, how “credibility” is judged, and how rules are interpreted. The episode connects these patterns to income, housing stability, access to care, and the emotional toll of being repeatedly disbelieved by the very system meant to support you. It also surfaces ideas for making the process more transparent, trauma-informed, and accountable to the veterans most likely to be harmed by gaps in the system.

This episode drops into the exam room and clinic to explore what happens when Black veterans describe pain, trauma, or chronic illness—and aren’t believed. Drawing on studies of pain management, PTSD care, and chronic disease outcomes, the episode shows how disrespect, bias, and dismissive communication lead to under-treatment, disengagement, and worse health over time. Listeners hear how “climate” shows up in very concrete ways: tone of voice, body language, rushed visits, or assumptions about substance use and “non-compliance.” The episode closes with a three-level set of ideas, veteran, clinician, and leadership, for rebuilding trust as something that is measurable and structural, not just about having a “nice” provider.