
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


I was really excited about revising my session from Educon 2.1 for TIE 2009. This is how it went (Including the presentation, the screencasts, the podcast for planning, and the twitter archive):
All of the best collaborations I have been a part of have started off with a lot of questions. Not “how do we get it done” questions, but rather questions that yearn for something more, questions that require you to truly envision something that has never existed before and then breathing it into being. Perhaps that is a little bit high minded for the type of collaboration I would like to do today, but I don’t think so.
I think that we can start with questioning the very nature of collaboration, the ways in which we communicate and come together. I believe that we can challenge the format and flow of our information. And in the process, I believe that we can create an instant and always-on type of collaboration that has never existed, until we all decide that it is worth building.
So, what are the questions that we would like to answer today? Well, I have a few to start:
In answering these questions and many others that you have come up with, I think we will come to an understanding of the nature of instant and always-on collaboration. In the hopes that we have something to grab ahold of in this discussion, I have outlined what I believe are the tenants of getting collaboration to be as simple as an on-button:
(All of these tenants assume one thing: All collaboration is made up of single acts that are held within a single space and a single time. Together these acts of collaboration make up the process of connecting with others, discussing ideas, and creating something new.)
Discuss.
Extra resources:
Ben Wilkoff Links:
Ustream Archive:
Twitter Archive:
Jun 25, 2009 05:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:20 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:19 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:17 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:09 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:04 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:00 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:36 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:27 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:26 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:25 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:13 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:05 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:47 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:45 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:37 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:30 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:26 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:19 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:18 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:16 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:15 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:12 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:09 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:04 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:02 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:54 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:47 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:42 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:36 PM GMT ·
By Ben WilkoffI was really excited about revising my session from Educon 2.1 for TIE 2009. This is how it went (Including the presentation, the screencasts, the podcast for planning, and the twitter archive):
All of the best collaborations I have been a part of have started off with a lot of questions. Not “how do we get it done” questions, but rather questions that yearn for something more, questions that require you to truly envision something that has never existed before and then breathing it into being. Perhaps that is a little bit high minded for the type of collaboration I would like to do today, but I don’t think so.
I think that we can start with questioning the very nature of collaboration, the ways in which we communicate and come together. I believe that we can challenge the format and flow of our information. And in the process, I believe that we can create an instant and always-on type of collaboration that has never existed, until we all decide that it is worth building.
So, what are the questions that we would like to answer today? Well, I have a few to start:
In answering these questions and many others that you have come up with, I think we will come to an understanding of the nature of instant and always-on collaboration. In the hopes that we have something to grab ahold of in this discussion, I have outlined what I believe are the tenants of getting collaboration to be as simple as an on-button:
(All of these tenants assume one thing: All collaboration is made up of single acts that are held within a single space and a single time. Together these acts of collaboration make up the process of connecting with others, discussing ideas, and creating something new.)
Discuss.
Extra resources:
Ben Wilkoff Links:
Ustream Archive:
Twitter Archive:
Jun 25, 2009 05:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:20 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:19 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:17 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:09 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:08 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:04 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 05:00 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:36 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:27 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:26 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:25 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:13 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 04:05 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:47 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:45 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:37 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:30 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:26 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:23 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:19 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:18 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:16 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:15 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:12 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:09 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:07 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:04 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 03:02 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:54 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:47 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:43 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:42 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:40 PM GMT ·
Jun 25, 2009 02:36 PM GMT ·