
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Episode 10 of License vs. Liberty, Malik Liberty examines how courts protect fundamental liberties — marriage, the ability to earn a living, and self-defense — from being rebranded as state-issued privileges. This episode explains how and when States may regulate, where constitutional limits apply, and how to challenge unlawful licensing practices.
Major cases cited (read them yourself): Loving v. Virginia (1967); Obergefell v. Hodges (2015); Turner v. Safley (1987); Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955); Bell v. Burson (1971); District of Columbia v. Heller (2008); McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010); New York Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen (2022); Shelley v. Kraemer (1948); Shapiro v. Thompson; Saenz v. Roe.
Note to critics: This episode is rooted in primary authorities: constitutional text and controlling Supreme Court opinions. If you disagree, bring the opinions and legal argument — not insults. Comments that are hostile, defamatory, or that deliberately misrepresent the law will be removed. Respectful legal debate is welcome.
(Open each link to read full opinions and authoritative summaries.)
Marriage:
Work / Licensing:
Self-Defense / Arms:
State-Action Doctrine / Public vs Private:
Ninth & Tenth Amendment summaries:
Travel / Licensing intersection:
News / Recent developments:
By Malik LibertyIn Episode 10 of License vs. Liberty, Malik Liberty examines how courts protect fundamental liberties — marriage, the ability to earn a living, and self-defense — from being rebranded as state-issued privileges. This episode explains how and when States may regulate, where constitutional limits apply, and how to challenge unlawful licensing practices.
Major cases cited (read them yourself): Loving v. Virginia (1967); Obergefell v. Hodges (2015); Turner v. Safley (1987); Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955); Bell v. Burson (1971); District of Columbia v. Heller (2008); McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010); New York Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen (2022); Shelley v. Kraemer (1948); Shapiro v. Thompson; Saenz v. Roe.
Note to critics: This episode is rooted in primary authorities: constitutional text and controlling Supreme Court opinions. If you disagree, bring the opinions and legal argument — not insults. Comments that are hostile, defamatory, or that deliberately misrepresent the law will be removed. Respectful legal debate is welcome.
(Open each link to read full opinions and authoritative summaries.)
Marriage:
Work / Licensing:
Self-Defense / Arms:
State-Action Doctrine / Public vs Private:
Ninth & Tenth Amendment summaries:
Travel / Licensing intersection:
News / Recent developments: