In carbon removal policy circles, three simple words - like-for-like - seem to come up more and more. It is a simple and obvious concept that is actually incredibly complex and misunderstood.

Robert Höglund joins Eve Tamme and Sebastian Manhart in exploring like-for-like as a concept, why it is becoming a core pillar of CDR policy design and what net-zero targets should actually look like.

Tune in to find out more

Links:

• Eve Tamme: LinkedIn and Website
• Sebastian Manhart: LinkedIn and Website
• Robert Höglund: LinkedIn, Website and Substack
• Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks
• The hidden risk in net zero targets: why storage durability matters
• How much carbon will we need to remove?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.