
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Chronological vs. Biological Age Chronological age is simply the amount of time that has passed since birth. In contrast, biological age quantifies the accumulation of molecular and cellular damage, reflecting an individual's functional state and susceptibility to disease and death. Because individuals age at different rates due to genetics, lifestyle, and environment, biological age is often a more accurate predictor of healthspan (years spent in good health) and lifespan than calendar years.
Measuring Biological Age Scientists have developed various "clocks" and biomarkers to estimate biological age:
• Epigenetic Clocks: These measure DNA methylation (chemical tags on DNA that regulate gene expression).
◦ First-Generation (e.g., Horvath, Hannum): Trained to predict chronological age.
◦ Second-Generation (e.g., PhenoAge, GrimAge): Trained to predict mortality and physiological dysregulation, making them better predictors of life expectancy. GrimAge is currently considered a gold standard for predicting mortality risk.
◦ Third-Generation (e.g., DunedinPACE): Unlike clocks that provide a static age in years, DunedinPACE functions as a "speedometer," measuring the current rate of aging (e.g., aging 1.2 biological years per chronological year). It was developed using longitudinal data tracking changes across 19 biomarkers over two decades.
◦ Reliability Improvements: Recent computational methods using Principal Component Analysis (PC clocks) have significantly reduced technical noise, improving the reliability of these measurements for longitudinal tracking.
• Multi-Omic and Proteomic Clocks: Newer models integrate multiple types of biological data. OMICmAge combines DNA methylation with proteomic, metabolomic, and clinical data to predict mortality with high accuracy. The Healthspan Proteomic Score (HPS) uses specific protein signatures to predict the risk of major chronic diseases and mortality.
• Clinical and Physical Biomarkers:
◦ Blood Markers: Key clinical biomarkers for longevity include ApoB (cardiovascular risk), HbA1c (metabolic health/glycation), and hs-CRP (systemic inflammation). "Optimal" ranges for longevity often differ from standard "normal" clinical reference ranges.
◦ Functional Metrics: VO2 max (cardiorespiratory fitness) and grip strength are potent predictors of functional independence and mortality, often outperforming traditional biomarkers like blood pressure.
Modifiability Biological age is malleable. Interventions such as caloric restriction, regular exercise, and stress management have been shown to slow the pace of aging as measured by these clocks. For instance, DunedinPACE has demonstrated sensitivity to short-term lifestyle interventions that older clocks might miss
By Stackx StudiosChronological vs. Biological Age Chronological age is simply the amount of time that has passed since birth. In contrast, biological age quantifies the accumulation of molecular and cellular damage, reflecting an individual's functional state and susceptibility to disease and death. Because individuals age at different rates due to genetics, lifestyle, and environment, biological age is often a more accurate predictor of healthspan (years spent in good health) and lifespan than calendar years.
Measuring Biological Age Scientists have developed various "clocks" and biomarkers to estimate biological age:
• Epigenetic Clocks: These measure DNA methylation (chemical tags on DNA that regulate gene expression).
◦ First-Generation (e.g., Horvath, Hannum): Trained to predict chronological age.
◦ Second-Generation (e.g., PhenoAge, GrimAge): Trained to predict mortality and physiological dysregulation, making them better predictors of life expectancy. GrimAge is currently considered a gold standard for predicting mortality risk.
◦ Third-Generation (e.g., DunedinPACE): Unlike clocks that provide a static age in years, DunedinPACE functions as a "speedometer," measuring the current rate of aging (e.g., aging 1.2 biological years per chronological year). It was developed using longitudinal data tracking changes across 19 biomarkers over two decades.
◦ Reliability Improvements: Recent computational methods using Principal Component Analysis (PC clocks) have significantly reduced technical noise, improving the reliability of these measurements for longitudinal tracking.
• Multi-Omic and Proteomic Clocks: Newer models integrate multiple types of biological data. OMICmAge combines DNA methylation with proteomic, metabolomic, and clinical data to predict mortality with high accuracy. The Healthspan Proteomic Score (HPS) uses specific protein signatures to predict the risk of major chronic diseases and mortality.
• Clinical and Physical Biomarkers:
◦ Blood Markers: Key clinical biomarkers for longevity include ApoB (cardiovascular risk), HbA1c (metabolic health/glycation), and hs-CRP (systemic inflammation). "Optimal" ranges for longevity often differ from standard "normal" clinical reference ranges.
◦ Functional Metrics: VO2 max (cardiorespiratory fitness) and grip strength are potent predictors of functional independence and mortality, often outperforming traditional biomarkers like blood pressure.
Modifiability Biological age is malleable. Interventions such as caloric restriction, regular exercise, and stress management have been shown to slow the pace of aging as measured by these clocks. For instance, DunedinPACE has demonstrated sensitivity to short-term lifestyle interventions that older clocks might miss