Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share @LunchtimeCrime | Waxing Defamatory
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
@LunchtimeCrime | Waxing Defamatory
Click here to reply to @LunchtimeCrime
"The court held that the display was clearly libelous because it gave the false impression that Monson was guilty of murder. The court emphasized the figure's placement in a murder scene and said that the public would take away from that the belief that he was guilty. The court thus determined that this that the display constitute a libel similar to a photograph or a written statement that had the potential to harm."
"The court held that the display was clearly libelous because it gave the false impression that Monson was guilty of murder. The court emphasized the figure's placement in a murder scene and said that the public would take away from that the belief that he was guilty. The court thus determined that this that the display constitute a libel similar to a photograph or a written statement that had the potential to harm."
View all episodes
By swellcast.com/LunchtimeCrimeClick here to reply to @LunchtimeCrime
"The court held that the display was clearly libelous because it gave the false impression that Monson was guilty of murder. The court emphasized the figure's placement in a murder scene and said that the public would take away from that the belief that he was guilty. The court thus determined that this that the display constitute a libel similar to a photograph or a written statement that had the potential to harm."
"The court held that the display was clearly libelous because it gave the false impression that Monson was guilty of murder. The court emphasized the figure's placement in a murder scene and said that the public would take away from that the belief that he was guilty. The court thus determined that this that the display constitute a libel similar to a photograph or a written statement that had the potential to harm."